- 1. Re: Item # 1834092464 (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Heuer" <pheuer@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 21:58:41 -0500
- Check out where the engine is sitting! It's a long way further forward than in a Tiger. Wouldn't this make for some interesting handling? I thought that was the problem with the Ken Miles prototype
- /html/tigers/2002-06/msg00046.html (6,964 bytes)
- 2. Re: Item # 1834092464 (score: 1)
- Author: sosnaenergyconsulting@cox.net
- Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 22:05:04 -0700
- Hi all: Actually, he also claims to have "done the rack and pinion steering right". With the engine as far forward as that, I wonder what, exactly, he did. Meanwhile, there's a beautiful TVR Vixen fo
- /html/tigers/2002-06/msg00049.html (7,462 bytes)
- 3. Re: Item # 1834092464 (score: 1)
- Author: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <kathy.coiner@gte.net>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:33:52 -0700
- Chebby motors have the sump in the rear of the oil pan. He is probably running the rack directly under the front (high) part of the oil pan. Erich
- /html/tigers/2002-06/msg00055.html (7,277 bytes)
- 4. Re: Item # 1834092464 (score: 1)
- Author: sosnaenergyconsulting@cox.net
- Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 08:14:45 -0700
- Oh, now THAT'S slick! Guess there's some compensation for having the distributor at the rear of the motor! Regards David
- /html/tigers/2002-06/msg00060.html (7,564 bytes)
- 5. Re: Item # 1834092464 (score: 1)
- Author: "lewis gooch" <LGOOCH@satx.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 19:29:13 -0500
- I sent an email to the builder: "I was wondering if you could give me some more info about what you mean when you say "Front is Mustang rack and pinion done right". I am sure other Tiger owners would
- /html/tigers/2002-06/msg00070.html (7,971 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu