- 1. RE: K& N filters (score: 1)
- Author: Jackson Zimmermann <JZIMMERM@exch.co.albemarle.va.us>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 10:05:37 -0500
- This quote regarding the lack of filtration from K&N filters is somewhat taken out of context. The person writing the article was in the construction business (this piece of mail is at least 2.5 year
- /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00028.html (7,989 bytes)
- 2. K& N filters (score: 1)
- Author: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 16:55:48 -0600
- Some interesting reading on the effectiveness of K & N filters from the LandCruiser list...
- /html/spridgets/1998-10/msg01045.html (10,960 bytes)
- 3. Re: K& N filters (score: 1)
- Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 19:14:09 -0500
- Geeze, Now what am I going to do? I too was a firm believer in K&N. Anybody got a paper air filter for a side draft Weber? Wiping out a fresh rebuild, Frank
- /html/spridgets/1998-10/msg01048.html (7,736 bytes)
- 4. Re: K& N filters (score: 1)
- Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 19:12:33 -0800 (PST)
- Maybe one has to look at K&N filters as a much better alternative to no filter rather than the better filter in every respect. Ulix (2 K&N filters for stock filter housings still in the box) Ulix __/
- /html/spridgets/1998-10/msg01055.html (8,075 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu