- 1. Kai's Speeding Ticket (score: 1)
- Author: Kenneth Allan Mitchell <nokones@kenmitchell.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:14:18 -0700
- You never said how fast you were going. The Fort Tejon Area office normally don't have time to write tickets for less than 85-90 MPH because they are so busy dealing with all the idiots driving 90+
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00089.html (8,773 bytes)
- 2. RE: Kai's Speeding Ticket (score: 1)
- Author: "Talley, Brooks" <brooks@frnk.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:36:38 -0700
- I'm going to have to respectfully disagree here. First, due to normal variations in speedometers, inflation differences in tires, slight variation in tire diameters if the tires aren't stock, etc, i
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00090.html (9,572 bytes)
- 3. RE: Kai's Speeding Ticket (score: 1)
- Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:53:06 -0500
- OMG that's funny! So, traffic penalties = taxes. Since they are taxes, it is our American duty to avoid them? As a bonus, this is ethically acceptable. Man, we need more people like you running this
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00091.html (8,063 bytes)
- 4. RE: Kai's Speeding Ticket (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Monday <boysrus_racing@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
- C'mon, Pat. It's just like the lottery, except with a better chance of "winning". They both generate the revenue needed to keep our great country safe! Kinda. I still think that tickets should have a
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00092.html (8,374 bytes)
- 5. RE: Kai's Speeding Ticket (score: 1)
- Author: "Talley, Brooks" <brooks@frnk.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:14:22 -0700
- You're darned tooting you do! That is, unless you're happy with the current approach of monetarily penalizing many perfectly harmless behaviors for the sole purpose of raising money to hire police t
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00093.html (8,923 bytes)
- 6. Re: Kai's Speeding Ticket (score: 1)
- Author: "matthew c. mead" <mmead-autox@goof.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:51:10 -0400
- I have to agree with you. The thing I really don't understand is how, once anyone shows enforcement is not uniform, any tickets should stick. I generally try to gauge my speedometers by watching thos
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00095.html (9,288 bytes)
- 7. Re: Kai's Speeding Ticket (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Parkanzky <parkanz1@msu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:10:59 -0400
- You're kidding, right? The principle of the matter? Trying to wiggle your way out of the consequences of your actions? Trying to avoid penalty for a crime that you admit to having committed on a tech
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00096.html (8,117 bytes)
- 8. Re: Kai's Speeding Ticket (score: 1)
- Author: "matthew c. mead" <mmead-autox@goof.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:14:19 -0400
- The principle of being treated unfairly by the legal system, including an improper trial procedure and an added penalty for deciding to protest the ticket in court, a RIGHT provided to you by the con
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00097.html (8,674 bytes)
- 9. Re: Kai's Speeding Ticket (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
- I could care less about the ticket, it's the horrendous effect on your insurance rates that ensues (with no actuarial justification that I've ever seen...). KeS /// unsubscribe/change address request
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00098.html (7,889 bytes)
- 10. Re: Kai's Speeding Ticket (score: 1)
- Author: "matthew c. mead" <mmead-autox@goof.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 20:14:50 -0400
- I have not seen a study that links speeding to higher accident rate, so we're in agreement on this. However, your ticket doesn't affect your insurance until you are convicted on the charges. -matt --
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00099.html (8,347 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu