Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Katie\s+Kelly\s+protest\s+$protestors\s+side$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Katie\s+Kelly\s+protest\s+$protestors\s+side$\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 10:00:37 -0700; First and foremost let me say that Ms. Kelly drove exceptionally well and is to be commended and congratulated for her performance. She has improved greatly this year and her 5th place showing in a v; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00952.html (10,804 bytes)
2. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: "Larry R. Metz" <lrmetz@home.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 12:47:57 -0400; I am glad to hear that you were able to explain your side. In our system, rules interpretation is a challenge at best, and until it gets better, protests seem to be the only way. Larry...I greatly re; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00953.html (11,824 bytes)
3. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 13:46:05 -0400 (EDT); Thanks for posting the other side of the story. Now it makes (at least some) sense. I find it faintly horrifying that someone feels they have to accuse someone else of cheating to get a rules clarif; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00955.html (9,368 bytes)
4. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:16:33 -0500; In my earlier post I made mention of what IMHO would have been the "gentlemanly thing to do." While I could wish it had been able to be accomplished in a way that was somewhat less upsetting to Kati; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00972.html (8,713 bytes)
5. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: Paul Czarnecki <oblique@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 17:37:58 -0400; or perhaps getting the protestee thinking that mindgames are going on. At least way, Katie didn't have it hanging over her head the whole week. Keven explicitly said that it was filed in advance wit; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00974.html (8,771 bytes)
6. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: Loren Williams <Loren@kscable.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 18:11:24 -0500; Hearing your side of the story, I understand where you were coming from. My only disappointment stems from the fact that you didn't arrange this with Katie first. You could have told her way before s; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00990.html (9,616 bytes)
7. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: Karl Witt <witt@mediaone.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 20:36:33 -0400; I think the correct answer was already given by somoeone else in this thread (sorry, but i don't remember who) and that would have been to set his own car up in such a way to get the clarification th; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00999.html (10,282 bytes)
8. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: "David Hawkins" <otgrouch@twosrus.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 19:11:58 -0500; This is what I've been thinking all day, but since my other account can't post to the list I didn't mention. A protest simply for a rules clarification should have been coordinated beforehand. What; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01001.html (10,040 bytes)
9. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 17:52:23 -0700; I think this has more to do with how many people feel about Katie than anything else. Speaking for myself, she has earned a lot of respect for her wit and writing ability, and her age/gender can perh; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01004.html (9,615 bytes)
10. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: Thomas Smith <tasmith@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 17:53:05 -0500; I hate to break it to you but this is an unfortunate byproduct of the protest system. I was protested last year and I fail to recall anyone being "upset" at the stress I endured while sitting in prot; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01006.html (9,047 bytes)
11. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: Loren Williams <Loren@kscable.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 19:57:21 -0500; If I'd protested someone that I knew, on the basis of getting a rules clarification, I'd have been sitting there with them. I'd have made it perfectly clear why I filed the protest and what my expect; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01007.html (10,211 bytes)
12. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 18:05:43 -0700; That is because instead of being the daughter I never had, Tom, you remind me of my brother-in-law, and your name does NOT start with K. 8-))))))) Seriously, that is my point. The reaction here is mo; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01009.html (9,241 bytes)
13. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: "David Hawkins" <otgrouch@twosrus.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 20:34:09 -0500; The person being protested could have been Paul Revere for all I care....my reaction is to the method, which was an ambush. It doesn't matter what you were looking for, or what point you were trying; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01012.html (9,719 bytes)
14. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 18:46:11 -0700; Agree with all of the above. If someone thought I was illegal, I would rather they mention it to me. If someone wants to make a point nationally, using my car, I would expect they would let me know.; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01013.html (10,259 bytes)
15. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: CSRX7@aol.com; Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 01:48:07 EDT; Kevin, you may and may not know me, although we've met at several Southern California events. I only know you and Katie from my limited contact with each of you at these few events over the years. I; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01032.html (13,539 bytes)
16. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: Gary Thomason <gtsolo2@home.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 01:47:59 -0700; David Hawkins illuminates the list with: And Randy Chase replies: Wow, I just can't stand it any longer. Two guys that weren't even there, got it all figured out and stating things as facts when they; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01036.html (12,191 bytes)
17. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 08:32:53 -0400 (EDT); I agree with you to a point, but the protest system itself is rather disruptive. I think some restraint based on "everyone will be pissed at me" isn't a bad thing. Either can be taken too far. In ot; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01040.html (9,762 bytes)
18. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 06:35:24 -0700; I made no such conclusion about Katie/Kevin's incident. Again, I repeat, my point was only that there was more of a reaction due to who was protested, and again, not based on the facts of the protest; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01043.html (9,128 bytes)
19. Re: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: Mdmtrsport@aol.com; Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:31:32 EDT; Not true, If they volunteer, then they are responsible to do a professional job to those they serve. If they can't do it to the satisfaction of the members served, they can, and should be, "fired". M; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01050.html (8,275 bytes)
20. RE: Katie Kelly protest (protestors side) (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 14:14:05 -0700; Don't have the form handy, but I believe the protest was officially filed at 1:50 pm, just prior to our third runs. later, Katie; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01104.html (8,119 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]