Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Knock\-offs\s+WANTEED\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 09:45:01 -0600
I'd like to buy 4 two eared knock-off nuts for my Sports Six. It has knock-off wires from a '69 GT6 on it now. I'd also like to get the appropriate wrench for the knock-offs. TIA, Chad
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01067.html (7,026 bytes)

2. Re: Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 08:58:26 -0800
Chad, Unless I miss something, there is no wrench for 2-eared knockoffs. You are to use a brass hammer. Thus the term "knock"-off. Joe Curry '63 Spit
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01069.html (7,910 bytes)

3. RE: Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 12:07:59 -0500
There is a wooden (I think) knock-off wrench that Moss Sells. It's overall length is just short of the diameter of a tire (don't know which one) and it has a cutout for the knockoff so that you can a
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01070.html (8,677 bytes)

4. Re: Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 12:53:53 -0500
Hey Joe: There's a "wrench" sold by Victoria British, and most of the other brit car suppliers, called appropriately enough, "The British Wheel Wrench", that lets you remove "knock-offs" without marr
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01071.html (9,055 bytes)

5. Re: Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 09:53:49 -0800
Actually, the Spit one is 18-878 (p.138 of the latest VB catalog) and sells for 34.95, you were looking at the octagonal wrench below. However, 2 things pop to mind. [1.] Because of the various sizes
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01072.html (9,184 bytes)

6. Re: Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 13:20:18 -0500
Wrong-o Joe. 17-878 is the wood block that surrounds the knock-off that prevents marring, but still requires the use of a hammer... If you'd look carefully at page 138, the part number I indicated (1
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01073.html (9,115 bytes)

7. Re: Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 10:19:54 -0800
Oh! You seem to be correct. But your point that the upper picture is what the user asked for "IS" in fact the point that I was trying to make. Sorry I didn't take the time to read on. Again, why buy
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01074.html (9,049 bytes)

8. Re: Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 17:08:36 -0500
Wrong again Joe... The upper picture (of the wood "ear-extender" style) is *not* what the original post was referring to, and is *not* what I was referring him to... If you review the original post b
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01077.html (10,292 bytes)

9. Re: Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 16:09:25 -0800
John, We could keep this up all week if you like. Let me be clear. I said (maybe not too clearly) that an earlier response alluded to a "wooden" type knockoff wrench. Are you with me still. Not Chad'
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01085.html (9,993 bytes)

10. Re: Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 20:23:42 -0500
Jeez, why do I seem to attract 'em like a moth to flame?!?! This is officially off-list. Sorry. The Vicky Brit part number I quoted is correct. What specifically about that has set Joe off on a homoc
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01088.html (8,513 bytes)

11. Re: Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 19:18:44 -0600
You are the flame, not the moth. Your words are inflammatory and I don't think you even know it. Larry Wilcox email: lwilcox@webzone.net --
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01091.html (8,323 bytes)

12. Re: Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 21:33:03 -0500
Your "correction" of my interpretation of my role in my moth to flame analogy seems to be somewhat unnecessary.. Clearly I considered myself to be the "flame" that attracts the nut cases, so I'm not
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01096.html (8,296 bytes)

13. Re: Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 23:53:09 -0800
I am not sure that it really matters anymore the original poster will probably never ask another question again for fear of starting a brawl. I think that we all sometimes take things to heart that m
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01102.html (9,213 bytes)

14. Re: Knock-offs WANTEED (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 09:03:23 -0500
Hey John.. I suspect that in a medium such as e-mail, where there is an absence of the usual visual cues found in "normal" conversation, that jokes and sarcasm are easy to misunderstand... For some r
/html/triumphs/1997-11/msg01104.html (10,195 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu