Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Kumho\s+758\s+tires\s+again\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Kumho\s+758\s+tires\s+again\.\.\.\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Kumho 758 tires again... (score: 1): Author: sooch@houston.rr.com; Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:53:35 -0600; Hey folks, Thanks again for the responses on what you thought about these tires. I have decided to go with them. Now I am trying to decide which size. About 3 years ago I happened upon a great deal f; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00063.html (7,522 bytes)
2. Re: Kumho 758 tires again... (score: 1): Author: <pennell@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:58:24 -0500; IMHO the 195 will look a little too "Hot Wheelish" Keith Pennell; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00088.html (7,984 bytes)
3. Re: Kumho 758 tires again... (score: 1): Author: "Mark and Kathy" <mgtrcars@galaxyinternet.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:54:21 -0500; Hot wheels are pulling some pretty good returns on investment these days so is that a good thing or a bad thing Keith? Please define. I thought that the list more or less concluded that the 165s didn; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00098.html (8,815 bytes)
4. Re: Kumho 758 tires again... (score: 1): Author: Roland Wilhelmy <rwil@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:18:21 -0800; Yes 175s such as the Michelin ZXs are great (in my experience and opinion), but not currently available so far as I know. The 165 - 15 radial is the older VW bug size. It is a little smaller than the; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00102.html (7,607 bytes)
5. Re: Kumho 758 tires again... (score: 1): Author: "Chris Masucci" <sooch@houston.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:10:36 -0700; Thanks guys for all of the input. I am not sure that I made the right decision, but I went with the 165s. I think they will be fine for now, and at some later date when the car is completed, I might; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00130.html (7,217 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]