Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*L\(arge\)BCs\s+and\s+security\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. L(arge)BCs and security (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 15:50:03 +0100
Yesterday Greenpeace invaded the Land Rover plant here in Solihull. The chained themselves to several of the biggest Range Rovers and brought all production to a halt for several hours. They put 'Cli
/html/mgs/2005-05/msg00219.html (8,128 bytes)

2. Re: L(arge)BCs and security (score: 1)
Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 21:18:22 -0500
Are the UK/European versions of the Land Rovers notorious polluters and/or gas hogs? Regards, CR
/html/mgs/2005-05/msg00223.html (7,934 bytes)

3. Re: L(arge)BCs and security (score: 1)
Author: Hans Duinhoven <h.duinhoven@planet.nl>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 08:05:50 +0200
As another European guy: This has more to do with the waste of energy and by this creating too much pollution compared with more commonly used type of cars according to this lobby. It is not only Lan
/html/mgs/2005-05/msg00224.html (9,976 bytes)

4. Re: L(arge)BCs and security (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 09:41:30 +0100
The bigger Range Rovers are, which was what were being targeted. -- Original Message --
/html/mgs/2005-05/msg00226.html (7,590 bytes)

5. Re: L(arge)BCs and security (score: 1)
Author: Bob Howard <mgbob@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 15:00:05 -0400
This week's The Economist, cover date May 14-20th, www.economist.com has a three-page article on bio-fuels, maize ethanol, peanut oil, rapeseed oil, soya oil, sugar-cane ethanol, and various mixes f
/html/mgs/2005-05/msg00231.html (9,234 bytes)

6. Re: L(arge)BCs and security (score: 1)
Author: RampantNM@aol.com
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 16:11:30 EDT
For this issue the usage of LPG maybe the solution. I have seen several MG's which have been converted to this fuel running without a problem. I would think you would lose a great deal of the trunk s
/html/mgs/2005-05/msg00264.html (8,644 bytes)

7. Re: L(arge)BCs and security (score: 1)
Author: Hans Duinhoven <h.duinhoven@planet.nl>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 13:35:48 +0200
Yes the LPG tanks would not be a big one, but one can do some 150 miles with it I assume looking to the LPG equipped GT's I've seen. Normal MGB's have much more restricted space for a tank. A GT stil
/html/mgs/2005-05/msg00268.html (10,024 bytes)

8. Re: L(arge)BCs and security (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 16:49:25 +0100
Holland got a rolling 25 year exemption? Lucky devil, this poxy Labour Government scrapped that when they first came to power and fixed it at 1st January 73. Luckily the roadster snuck through, as al
/html/mgs/2005-05/msg00272.html (8,540 bytes)

9. Re: L(arge)BCs and security (score: 1)
Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 22:33:35 -0500
Not too far from me a local farmer has been making and selling to local farmers a soy oil used for a 10% soy, 90% oil, biodiesel. Blake
/html/mgs/2005-05/msg00276.html (7,658 bytes)

10. Re: L(arge)BCs and security (score: 1)
Author: RampantNM@aol.com
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 00:09:19 EDT
Yes the LPG tanks would not be a big one, but one can do some 150 miles with it That's only two trips to work and back for me, and fueling stations are not nearly as prevalent as gas stations around
/html/mgs/2005-05/msg00281.html (7,888 bytes)

11. Re: L(arge)BCs and security (score: 1)
Author: Hans Duinhoven <h.duinhoven@planet.nl>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 21:19:33 +0200
Just to tease you a bit more: In the Netherlands cars built before I think 1975 do not need to comply to any emmission regulation. My '71 GT would not pass @ all! Cheers, Hans Holland got a rolling 2
/html/mgs/2005-05/msg00290.html (8,915 bytes)

12. Re: L(arge)BCs and security (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 15:24:51 +0100
That *is* the same as the UK, just a visual check for smoke. -- Original Message -- Just to tease you a bit more: In the Netherlands cars built before I think 1975 do not need to comply to any emmiss
/html/mgs/2005-05/msg00324.html (7,589 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu