Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LBC\s+article\s+in\s+NY\s+Times\s+FULL\s+TEXT\-\-\-\s+Fw\:\s+NYTimes\.com\s+Article\:Blood\,\s+Sweat\,\s+Tears\s+and\s+a\s+Lot\s+of\s+Oil\s+Leaks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LBC\s+article\s+in\s+NY\s+Times\s+FULL\s+TEXT\-\-\-\s+Fw\:\s+NYTimes\.com\s+Article\:Blood\,\s+Sweat\,\s+Tears\s+and\s+a\s+Lot\s+of\s+Oil\s+Leaks\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LBC article in NY Times FULL TEXT--- Fw: NYTimes.com Article:Blood, Sweat, Tears and a Lot of Oil Leaks (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 17:10:41 -0400; I read this, uh, "non-fiction" piece and it quickly became apparent that the premise of the article was to again describe British cars as unreliable. IMHO, the first 1/3 of this is but a load of do-d; /html/spridgets/2002-06/msg00326.html (9,708 bytes)
2. RE: LBC article in NY Times FULL TEXT--- Fw: NYTimes.com Article:Blood, Sweat, Tears and a Lot of Oil Leaks (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:30:20 -0700; I guess I read it differently although I do agree that the author slanted the article in a negative manner. I noted that every one of those "owners" who complained said they would still keep their (o; /html/spridgets/2002-06/msg00330.html (8,003 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]