Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LIGHT\s+CONNECTING\s+ROD\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LIGHT\s+CONNECTING\s+ROD\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LIGHT CONNECTING ROD (score: 1): Author: "The Butters Family" <bbutters@coldreams.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 22:41:32 -0700; OKAY GUYS I HAVE THIS UNUSED SET OF ANSEN MOLY RODS WHICH I THOUGHT AND LOOK LIKE A MATCHED SET. ONE HOWEVER IS 25g lighter THAN THE OTHERS WHICH ARE PERFECT MATCHED. THE BEAM IS THE LIGHTER AREA. SO; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00051.html (7,547 bytes)
2. Fw: LIGHT CONNECTING ROD (score: 1): Author: "Marge and/or Dave Thomssen" <mdthom@radiks.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 09:29:04 -0500; It would seem if the light rod was strong enough, the other 7 would be strong enough when lightened to the weight of the light one. What does anyone else think? Dave the hayseed OKAY GUYS I HAVE THI; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00053.html (7,975 bytes)
3. light connecting rod (score: 1): Author: "The Butters Family" <bbutters@coldreams.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 08:43:38 -0700; These rods are for a 440 Mopar, would use them in a 392 hemi, They are new and are very good rods made of 4340AC and Vasco Jet 1000. The Wight difference is in the beam which is why that is where I w; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00058.html (7,524 bytes)
4. Re: LIGHT CONNECTING ROD (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 09:17:21 -0700 (PDT); Thinking totally outside the box here - - do you have enough room in your block to use longer rod bolts and double nut them to gain 25 grams? If not, how about adding the weight inside the wrist pin?; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00064.html (8,526 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]