Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LSR\s+claimed\s+by\s+the\s+Air\s+Force\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LSR\s+claimed\s+by\s+the\s+Air\s+Force\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: John Szalay <john.szalay@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 12:23:46 -0400; Well its NOT wheel driven, and there is no driver on board and it used 4 engines. and there was no return run. but the Air Force is claiming a Land-Speed record from themselves 6,416 mph on a 16,120; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00040.html (8,574 bytes)
2. Re: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 08:35:09 -0700; Wonder if they had the high priced FIA team on board to verify the speed run /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Ar; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00043.html (8,643 bytes)
3. RE: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 23:47:10 -0500; wouldn't have done any good to have any (paid) FIA people there-- they didn't have any SCTA volunteers to prepare the course, inspect the vehicle, or set-up and conduct the timing. No REAL Landspeed; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00045.html (8,495 bytes)
4. Re: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:01:38 -0700; we feed them too, wow vehicle, run /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00046.html (9,292 bytes)
5. Re: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: Rick Byrnes <Rick@rbmotorsports.com>; Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 12:04:00 -0400; If Barrett didn't time it, aint nothin to me /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/a; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00048.html (8,147 bytes)
6. Re: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:13:00 -0700; We even time light-ning strikes Glen -- Original Message -- From: "Rick Byrnes" <Rick@rbmotorsports.com> To: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; "John Szalay" <john.szalay@worldnet.att.net>; <l; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00050.html (8,646 bytes)
7. Re: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: Ed Van Scoy <ed@vetteracing.com>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:33:48 -0700; Why do you think it cost them 20 million bucks ;-) verify the speed run /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archive; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00052.html (8,562 bytes)
8. RE: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Landspeed Louise Ann Noeth" <landspeedlouise@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:41:01 -0700; I have contacted the Air Force and in the process of setting the fly folks straight on what at REAL LSR is made of. . . stand by. Speedy Regards, "LandSpeed" Louise Ann Noeth LandSpeed Productions "T; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00054.html (9,017 bytes)
9. Re: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 10:17:36 -0700; Yeah, 11'000 feet was inside a tunnel, so no wind factor or gradent change. So I guess no two way req'd. Wonder how many years it will take them to get a record cert. Glen -- Original Message -- From; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00058.html (9,590 bytes)
10. Re: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 15:11:02 -0400; So like where do you think we could find the zero mass driver to pilot this thing.. Just imagine the g forces.. This is Mach 8.5 at the 3.. It has to make a top fuel car be like a Yugo going uphill f; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00064.html (9,687 bytes)
11. Re: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>; Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 13:20:25 -0600; I guess that red rtv is some good stuff..... Joe :) /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00068.html (9,362 bytes)
12. Re: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Jim Belford" <jimbelford@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 13:37:16 -0600; I was involved in some testing on the sled track at Holloman about 10 years ago that approached 8000 FPS. That was very impressive at the time with multiple sonic booms. I was looking at the video an; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00071.html (10,460 bytes)
13. RE: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Mathew Sanchez" <mathew.sanchez@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 20:41:45 +0100; The figures are astounding, how do they stop the thing? --Original Message-- From: owner-land-speed@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-land-speed@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Jim Belford Sent: 02 May 2003; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00072.html (9,928 bytes)
14. Re: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Jim Belford" <jimbelford@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 13:43:58 -0600; if you are interested, they actually use a fairly simple (rudimentary) process to measure velocity. It involves using pencils placed in holders along the track. As the sled travels down the track a; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00073.html (9,715 bytes)
15. RE: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Jim Belford" <jimbelford@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 14:33:44 -0600; There is 10 miles of track and they use different methods to slow the sled depending on the speed and type of test. The most extreme is with very thick cement walls for testing the penetration capabi; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00079.html (9,348 bytes)
16. RE: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Mathew Sanchez" <mathew.sanchez@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 21:46:18 +0100; I'd like to know how much distance something at that speed would take to stop naturally and was wondering if the remaining 10 miles would be long enough? The air resistance and friction must take a b; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00080.html (9,354 bytes)
17. RE: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Landspeed Louise Ann Noeth" <landspeedlouise@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 15:48:10 -0700; OK boys, let's be honest . . . the rub here has nothing to do with the engineering, or achievement (great job from my perch) and everything to do with chest puffing about a "world land speed record."; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00083.html (9,194 bytes)
18. RE: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 13:15:36 -0500; I wonder what type of bearings they used on the sled rails? Magnetic levitation? ...or did it "fly" on a gas film? Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ So like where do you think we could find the zero mass driv; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00232.html (9,509 bytes)
19. RE: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 13:19:08 -0500; Years ago, Col. John Stapp actually rode a rocket sled in testing. It was stopped by a scoop that dipped into a water channel under the tracks. High-G tests!!! Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ The figures a; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00233.html (9,682 bytes)
20. RE: LSR claimed by the Air Force (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 13:21:40 -0500; Is that where the expression "a lead sled" came from? :) Sorry for commenting on so many old posts but I was in WV for a week or so and I just returned to AZ. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ Glen, if you a; /html/land-speed/2003-05/msg00234.html (8,811 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]