- 1. Re: Larry Wright's Relevance Challenge! (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 10:32:17 -0800
- Larry, You have challenged me to show that my educationally motivated response, for your edification, to make a stupid post have some benefit to Tiger owners. I'd be glad to oblige, and accept your c
- /html/tigers/2001-12/msg00070.html (9,125 bytes)
- 2. Re: Larry Wright's Relevance Challenge! (score: 1)
- Author: "Stu Brennan" <stubrennan@mediaone.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:01:58 -0500
- I've got it! The Klein bottle is "Rev B" of those "weather glass barometers"! I should have recognized it sooner, since I have rev A on the wall at home. Stu
- /html/tigers/2001-12/msg00072.html (6,881 bytes)
- 3. Re: Larry Wright's Relevance Challenge! (score: 1)
- Author: "Arden Bedell" <sixtysixtiger@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 11:22:46 -0800
- Steve, being the eternal optimist, has assumed that a vessel with a single surface would unfailingly contain any fluid. However, wouldn't it be just as likely that the converse would be true and the
- /html/tigers/2001-12/msg00074.html (9,967 bytes)
- 4. Re: Larry Wright's Relevance Challenge! (score: 1)
- Author: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>
- Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 19:58:48 -0700
- Reading the website's text will reveal that the Klein bottle is considered to be a 'zero-volume' container, and they are willing to provide appropriately calibrated units for precise experimentation.
- /html/tigers/2001-12/msg00082.html (7,244 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu