Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Last\s+Year\s+for\s+Austin\-Healeys\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Last\s+Year\s+for\s+Austin\-Healeys\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Last Year for Austin-Healeys (score: 1): Author: FunE4MG <FunE4MG@aol.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 13:21:26 EDT; Hey Gang, I was beset upon this past weekend by a Large Healey enthusiast (no, he wasn't big... but his car was) who told me that last year for Austin-Healey was 1967. Now I know the Sprite continued; /html/spridgets/1998-04/msg00872.html (7,351 bytes)
2. Re: Last Year for Austin-Healeys (score: 1): Author: Reid Trummel <reidt@erols.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 15:39:36 -0400; Yes, 1967 was the last year for the *big* Healeys, although of course one more car was assembled in March 1968, but that was not part of regular production, and 1967 was the last year for all intent; /html/spridgets/1998-04/msg00876.html (8,610 bytes)
3. Re: Last Year for Austin-Healeys (score: 1): Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 20:13:19 -0400; I agree with Reid, an Austin Healey Sprite, even a 1970 model was still a HEALEY. -- Frank Clarici Toms River, NJ Too many LBCs 3 Sprites, an Austin A40, and an Austin Mini all on the road. 1 Jaguar; /html/spridgets/1998-04/msg00881.html (8,392 bytes)
4. Re: Last Year for Austin-Healeys (score: 1): Author: GuyWeller <GuyWeller@aol.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 15:27:02 EDT; I have one of the Austin Sprites. They "lost" the Healey bit when Donald Healey's original contract to use his name ran out in 1970 and Austin were too tight fisted to be prepared to continue with t; /html/spridgets/1998-04/msg00926.html (7,486 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]