Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Legislative\s+Alert\s+for\s+Washingtonians\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Legislative\s+Alert\s+for\s+Washingtonians\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Legislative Alert for Washingtonians (score: 1): Author: David Breneman <david_breneman@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:24:04 -0800 (PST); Posted 09 December 2004 at 17:22:51 UK time I'm posting this here becasue it effects predominantly MGB owners. Outgoing Governor Gary Locke announced today that he'd like to give us a little somethin; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00159.html (8,365 bytes)
2. Re: Legislative Alert for Washingtonians (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 09:56:36 -0800; Whoa! Don't panic. You are not correct about the practical details of California's current laws. California recently changed its smog inspection requirements from a "30-year rolling" limit to "1974-a; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00160.html (10,447 bytes)
3. Re: Legislative Alert for Washingtonians (score: 1): Author: David Breneman <david_breneman@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:32:00 -0800 (PST); I don't think I'm being overly alarmist. Obviously, all I know about California's laws is what I read on this and other mailing lists from other Californians complaining about tham. But in addition t; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00161.html (8,415 bytes)
4. Re: Legislative Alert for Washingtonians (score: 1): Author: David Breneman <david_breneman@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:32:25 -0800 (PST); I don't think I'm being overly alarmist. Obviously, all I know about California's laws is what I read on this and other mailing lists from other Californians complaining about tham. But in addition t; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00162.html (8,420 bytes)
5. Re: Legislative Alert for Washingtonians (score: 1): Author: David Breneman <david_breneman@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:33:09 -0800 (PST); I don't think I'm being overly alarmist. Obviously, all I know about California's laws is what I read on this and other mailing lists from other Californians complaining about tham. But in addition t; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00163.html (8,383 bytes)
6. Re: Legislative Alert for Washingtonians (score: 1): Author: TR6UO@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 03:09:08 EST; California recently changed its smog inspection requirements from a "30-year rolling" limit to "1974-and-later permanently". Your are correct except that the exemptions end with '74 models. '75 and l; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00168.html (7,307 bytes)
7. Re: Legislative Alert for Washingtonians (score: 1): Author: Aaron Whiteman <awhitema@panix.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 07:03:29 -0800; I think you might be. Calling on Washingtonians to help "put the kibosh on this lunatic scheme" *without even knowing the details of the scheme* seems alarmist to me. But that's just me. I plan on tr; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00170.html (9,829 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]