Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Lenco\s+for\s+LSR\s+vs\s+T\-10\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Lenco\s+for\s+LSR\s+vs\s+T\-10\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Lenco for LSR vs T-10 (score: 1): Author: William T Smith <WmTSmith@landracing.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 08:13:00 -0600 (MDT); John, Those figures match what I get from GM. If I were doing it I would look at a T-10 and as close as I could get 3rd 4th unless I had a realy wide torque band. wmts Quoting John Beckett <landspeed; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00427.html (9,994 bytes)
2. Re: Lenco for LSR vs T-10 (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:09:33 -0400; Yup, the wide ratio drop on most factory 5-speed OD's (and automatic OD's too) is what makes them less than ideal for Bonneville use. John -- Original Message -- From: "William T Smith" <WmTSmith@lan; /html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00435.html (11,202 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]