Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Lifter\s+Hardness\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Lifter\s+Hardness\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Lifter Hardness (score: 1): Author: WEmery7451@aol.com; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:22:26 EDT; << If anyone has any REAL factory data on hardness specs for TR lifters Moss would love to get a copy. THey want to know how hard is enough for good reliability and where hardness might start causing; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00112.html (8,427 bytes)
22. Re: Lifter Hardness (score: 1): Author: WEmery7451@aol.com; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:44:28 EDT; << I just look at them and either toss or reuse. ALL the cam folks say this is huge no-no. So is reusing old good lifters from junk engines >> One old theory was to take good old lifters somewhere to; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00113.html (8,602 bytes)
23. Re: Lifter Hardness (score: 1): Author: BillDentin@aol.com; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:53:12 EDT; We were involved with BRITISH FRAME & ENGINE and 'the problem' when the GT40 cam followers were discovered. Kevin Potter, our engine builder, came up with the idea to keep the sleeves in the freezer; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00114.html (8,268 bytes)
24. Re: Lifter Hardness (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:20:17 EDT; Matching hardness makes sense....gear hardness falls within a fairly narrow band of specification at 58-62 RC. I wonder also about the depth of hardening (case hardness) on lifters. Isnt Chuck Gee a; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00116.html (8,223 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]