Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Lifter\s+Hardness\s+Confusion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Lifter\s+Hardness\s+Confusion\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Lifter Hardness Confusion (score: 1): Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 13:18:45 -0500; Greg Solow's post in January said he typically gets 52 to 55 for OEM lifters. I just had a set tested that ranged from 48 to 53 (note: these were measured on the 15-N scale and I'm converting to Rc).; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00097.html (6,839 bytes)
2. RE: Lifter Hardness Confusion (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:38:24 -0700; According to everything I've read (and who believes that) the cores that cams are made from are flame hardened well down into the barrel of the cam, so regrinding doesn't require rehardening (which i; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00098.html (7,674 bytes)
3. Re: Lifter Hardness Confusion (score: 1): Author: "John Kipping" <johnkipping@inet.net.nz>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:35:30 +1200; After seeing a variety of reprofiled cams fall apart within a few thousand miles I had them all subsequently rehardened (a few hundred). To the best of my knowledge the cam lobes are chill cast iron,; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00104.html (7,925 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]