- 1. Lightweight lap belts (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 23:30:15 -0800
- Looking at the last sentence of 14.2D: "The OEM seat belts may be removed to facilitate the installation of alternate restraints complying with safety requirements" and 3.3.1 "Seat lap belts are requ
- /html/autox/2001-11/msg00172.html (7,280 bytes)
- 2. Re: Lightweight lap belts (score: 1)
- Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 03:20:17 -0600
- It begs the question of how much weight can actually be saved with a "lightweight" belt/harness system, since they do not weigh all that much anyway? And why would you want to compromise a primary sa
- /html/autox/2001-11/msg00173.html (8,763 bytes)
- 3. Re: Lightweight lap belts (score: 1)
- Author: KATNDADRACING@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:00:44 EST
- Ya know, why does the old saying come to mind. "Buy a $50.00 helmet for a $50.00 head". Saving money and saving weight are the main reasons we take short cuts in our car prep. We put a four point in
- /html/autox/2001-11/msg00176.html (7,337 bytes)
- 4. Re: Lightweight lap belts (score: 1)
- Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 17:32:20 -0600
- Actually, in SCCA Solo II there is no time limitation on harnesses. The statement is true in SCCA road racing, however, where belts cannot be more than five years old (some sanctioning bodies [NHRA?
- /html/autox/2001-11/msg00199.html (7,352 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu