- 1. Re: Lily's Mini and rant against Kodak (score: 1)
- Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:05:37 -0500
- Nice little thumbnail. To bad this web site makes you sign up for the spam or the mailing lists they sell. To bad all I'll see is the thumbnail. Kodak pulls the same stunt with their CD. You can't u
- /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00686.html (7,673 bytes)
- 2. Re: Lily's Mini and rant against Kodak (score: 1)
- Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:08:35 -0400
- Which CD is that? /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
- /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00687.html (8,053 bytes)
- 3. Re: Lily's Mini and rant against Kodak (score: 1)
- Author: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
- Bullwinkle SEZ - The government has the military and police power behind it. Kmart doesn't. Your dealings with Kmart are all voluntary. As annoying as this type of stuff is, that's a big difference.
- /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00690.html (7,511 bytes)
- 4. RE: Lily's Mini and rant against Kodak (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Vanner" <phil@outtech.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:24:01 -0500
- That's why I maintain a "throwaway" email account at Yahoo. So I can sign up for things without using my active address. I have been told there is a way to share photos on Ofoto without requiring thi
- /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00693.html (8,359 bytes)
- 5. Re: Lily's Mini and rant against Kodak (score: 1)
- Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:12:09 -0500
- <<<snip>>> That's why I maintain a "throwaway" email account at Yahoo. <<<snip>>> I've done this several times also. Every bit of information used to create thenm is contrived. Blake MG TD MGA twin
- /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00697.html (7,153 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu