Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Limited\s+Prep\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+Prather\s+retraction\s+2$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Limited\s+Prep\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+Prather\s+retraction\s+2$\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Limited Prep (was Re: Prather retraction 2) (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:05:15 -0500; Andrew, thanks for that. Since I griped about the Prather comment in the first place, I should say I very much appreciate your comment/retraction/clarification. And then, moving on, you now raise a l; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00261.html (13,053 bytes)
2. Re: Limited Prep (was Re: Prather retraction 2) (score: 1): Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl@gt-classics.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 19:18:15 -0400; Hi Rocky, As usual, well said - however: Ummm, yeah, actually. At the last couple of races at Summit Point, there's been a '66 or '67 big block Corvette running in GT-1. Definitely very cool. We also; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00265.html (7,601 bytes)
3. Re: Limited Prep (was Re: Prather retraction 2) (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 01:06:23 -0500; Well, I did say seen "many", not "any". :-) I see one on rare occasion. Fun to watch. Never competitive ('cept maybe on Regional-race level). --Rocky many; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00269.html (8,279 bytes)
4. Re: Limited Prep (was Re: Prather retraction 2) (score: 1): Author: "Robert Dardano" <19to1tr6@attbi.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:51:06 -0400; Look were the miata is taking the scca from a few running not long ago to maybe 25% of the field at to days events and the fastest growing class.(sorry Lyn did not read yours first) Mazda has filled; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00294.html (15,037 bytes)
5. Re: Limited Prep (was Re: Prather retraction 2) (score: 1): Author: "andrew stark" <whitedog72@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:43:46 +0000; Your not kidding on the power to weight penalties for TR's. I had to add 20lbs to my GT-6 to be legal. My car is all steel and I made absolutely no attempt and saving weight when building it. It is c; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00295.html (17,897 bytes)
6. Re: Limited Prep (was Re: Prather retraction 2) (score: 1): Author: "Kas Kastner" <kaskas@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 07:23:37 -0700; Part of my job as Competition Manager for Triumph was to see that the regulations were favaored as much as possible towards our cars and that the selection of classes gave us a "fit" that was competi; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00296.html (19,717 bytes)
7. Re: Limited Prep (was Re: Prather retraction 2) (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 08:00:20 -0700; Alas! I wish I had that problem. I am forced by SCCA to run in a class that has a minimum weight of 1000 pounds. In spite of everything I have done to lighten the car, it still weighs in at about 147; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00298.html (8,769 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]