Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Long\s+Rods\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Long\s+Rods\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Long Rods (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hokanson" <tgrr2@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 10:32:01 -0800; Don't know if the subject is dead or if it is wise to revive it, but I recently came across an article which is a reasonable explanation of how longer connecting rods make more horsepower. You can ac; /html/tigers/1999-01/msg00557.html (6,330 bytes)
2. Re: Long Rods (score: 1): Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 14:41:21 -0600; 5.0 Mustang Mag by Peterson Pubs. 11:1 compression with If you are interested in pursuing a long rod 302, set your browser to http://www.geocities.com/Baja/Trails/1630/trx/trx-4.htm. There you'll se; /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00286.html (8,253 bytes)
3. Re: Long Rods (score: 1): Author: "Chris Richards" <richards@northcoast.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 17:50:32 -0500; Stroker 289???!! Thgis guy obviously has way too much time and mon;ey on his hands. Chris in Trinidad and pictures of Dave's balancing of a 366 cubic inch 289 stroker crank.; /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00295.html (7,059 bytes)
4. Re: Long Rods (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 21:26:52 EST; << Stroker 289???!! Thgis guy obviously has way too much time and mon;ey on his hands. >> Stroking a 289 is basically the equivalent to stroking a 302. Many prefer the earlier 289 blocks, especially; /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00300.html (6,864 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]