Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Looking\s+at\s+Stock\s+from\s+the\s+other\s+angle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Looking\s+at\s+Stock\s+from\s+the\s+other\s+angle\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Looking at Stock from the other angle (score: 1): Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 08:23:01 -0700; I was truly blown away by some of the stronger "go away and leave us alone - we're happy" responses to my suggestion to make some movement back towards "Stock is Stock" concept. It reminded me of a s; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01429.html (9,262 bytes)
2. Re: Looking at Stock from the other angle (score: 1): Author: Chris Franson <cfranson@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 12:14:29 -0400; Not to keep beating the dead horse, but how many people (not necessarily autocrossers) do you know who drive a car which would actually be legal in this "pure stock" class? When people put mufflers o; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01432.html (9,895 bytes)
3. Re: Looking at Stock from the other angle (score: 1): Author: Stephen Bernard <solo-2@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 01:32:38 -0400; I did notice that you didn't respond to the e-mail that I sent you Scot. But I am in stock and and I AM here. What you propose would NOT affect me since my car is 100% factory stock with nothing at; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01476.html (8,721 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]