Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Low\s+rise\s+intake\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Low\s+rise\s+intake\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Low rise intake (score: 1): Author: "Doug & Rett Leithauser" <dleit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 10:21:53 -0500; You wrote; " The earlier 'low-rise' four-barrel Tiger manifold that is pictured in TBON is quite different, but I have no idea what was actually compared to what, almost forty years ago." I do not h; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00000.html (6,985 bytes)
2. Low rise intake (score: 1): Author: "Doug & Rett Leithauser" <dleit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 09:17:23 -0500; Thanks to everyone who responded to my low rise manifold questions. the manifold on my Tiger is not the one pictured, and remains unidentified. Happy Motoring Doug Leithauser; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00041.html (6,589 bytes)
3. Re: Low rise intake (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 19:41:51 EST; The Performance Tuning the Tiger shows good pictures of the Eldebrock manifold. Dave Johnson; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00049.html (6,363 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]