Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Lucas\s+Sport\s+Coil\s+\(was\:\s+Early\s+Wiper\s+Arm\s+Removal\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Lucas Sport Coil (was: Early Wiper Arm Removal) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Shoyer <steve@shoyer.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 10:36:53 -0500
I have an '80 MGB with the factory electronic ignition. Can I use the Lucas sport coil? If not, any other suggestions for a hotter coil? Thanks. --Steve immediately!
/html/mgs/1998-11/msg00349.html (7,984 bytes)

2. RE: Lucas Sport Coil (was: Early Wiper Arm Removal) (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 08:28:06 -0800
You can use the Lucas Sport Coil. But it is set up for an unballasted system. You will have to bypass the resistive wire that feeds the original coil. The B does not use an external ballast resistor
/html/mgs/1998-11/msg00403.html (8,735 bytes)

3. RE: Lucas Sport Coil (was: Early Wiper Arm Removal) (score: 1)
Author: Nory@webtv.net (Nory)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 16:35:52 -0500 (EST)
The B does not And you won't fry the coil, like you would a normal coil without the ballast resistor? Why not? -NORY Don't assume that because you have found one problem, you have found the ONLY prob
/html/mgs/1998-11/msg00417.html (8,578 bytes)

4. Re: Lucas Sport Coil (was: Early Wiper Arm Removal) (score: 1)
Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.bc.ca>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 14:34:42 -0800
Its my understanding that the ballast resistor is bypassed on startup to provide 12v to the coil for better starting, then after starting current flows over the resistive wire to supply something lik
/html/mgs/1998-11/msg00424.html (8,278 bytes)

5. RE: Lucas Sport Coil (was: Early Wiper Arm Removal) (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 14:49:04 -0800
I just about got beaten to the punch. Very briefly, early (pre 72) MG's used a coil (DLB101) that ran happily on full operating voltage (9-15 volts). From approx 72 on to meet the emmission cycle re
/html/mgs/1998-11/msg00429.html (9,957 bytes)

6. Re: Lucas Sport Coil (was: Early Wiper Arm Removal) (score: 1)
Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.bc.ca>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 15:58:00 -0800
Using the sport coil with the ballasted system would still give you more sparking voltage than the stock coil, wouldn't it? Since it has more internal windings or some such. Not that I'm advocating N
/html/mgs/1998-11/msg00432.html (8,076 bytes)

7. RE: Lucas Sport Coil (was: Early Wiper Arm Removal) (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 15:58:25 -0800
Pick away mate, I havn't the faintest idea. I've got the feeling that it probably works at least as well as the stock coil. I base this on the knowledge that lots of people (including myself) have i
/html/mgs/1998-11/msg00438.html (8,301 bytes)

8. RE: Lucas Sport Coil (was: Early Wiper Arm Removal) (score: 1)
Author: Nory@webtv.net (Nory)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 08:09:01 -0500 (EST)
MG's used a coil when the using the DLB105 >sport coil in a vehicle newer than 72 you Kelvin, SO the Lucas Sports Coil can handle the full voltage without getting hot and burning out, like a normal c
/html/mgs/1998-11/msg00477.html (9,739 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu