Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*M3\s+Classing\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*M3\s+Classing\s+question\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. M3 Classing question (score: 1): Author: William Loring <bloring@TIRERACK.COM>; Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 13:47:34 -0500; A 96 M3 with springs, shocks, and intake. Is this car eligible for STS, or does it go to BSP? It's got street tires, but I'm not sure of the size. I'm guessing the car goes to BSP, but was hoping for; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00474.html (7,534 bytes)
2. Re: M3 Classing question (score: 1): Author: "matthew c. mead" <mmead-autox@goof.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:37:49 -0400; STS requires displacement of 3.0l or less, doesn't it? The 96 and on E36 M3's have a displacement of 3.2l. With the modifications you mentioned, BSP is the right class. You could always do more and r; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00476.html (9,083 bytes)
3. Re: M3 Classing question (score: 1): Author: William Loring <bloring@TIRERACK.COM>; Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 14:51:46 -0500; I'm going to place this driver in SM, it seems the best fit for him. He'd only have one other competitor in BSP, and that guy will only be there for one day of a two-day event. In SM, he'll have 7-8; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00477.html (10,058 bytes)
4. Re: M3 Classing question (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 16:49:37 -0400 (EDT); I think its not allowed in STS. However, it fits in SM, which has a better pax than BSP... Mark /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mai; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00479.html (7,737 bytes)
5. Re: M3 Classing question (score: 1): Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:25:01 -0700; IIRC, the E36 M3 is also excluded from STX, isn't it? I know the question has been answered already, but I'd say BSP or SM for this car. And now I'll return to lurking! :) Scot /// unsubscribe/change; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00481.html (7,772 bytes)
6. RE: M3 Classing question (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 19:41:15 -0500; IIRC, the E36 M3 is also excluded from STX, isn't it? I know the question has been answered already, but I'd say BSP or SM for this car. == That is correct. The E36 chassis' M3s are verboten in STX.; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00482.html (8,068 bytes)
7. Re: M3 Classing question (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 21:14:33 -0400; Actually, he can run in STX... It has higher displacement limits. Mike /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00483.html (10,026 bytes)
8. Re: M3 Classing question (score: 1): Author: "Steven T. Ekstrand" <cyberlaw@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 23:46:35 -0700; When they created the class they created an exclusion list that included E36 and E43 M3's. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/l; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00489.html (7,619 bytes)
9. re: M3 Classing question (score: 1): Author: David Hillman <hillman@planet-torque.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:17:05 -0400 (EDT); "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org> wrote... Not Z3s. You have to have 4 seats for STS. -- D a v i d H i l l m a n hillman@planet-torque.com /// unsubscribe/change address requests to m; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00506.html (7,620 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]