Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MG\s+Rover\s+\'not\s+in\s+administration\'\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MG\s+Rover\s+\'not\s+in\s+administration\'\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Fw: MG Rover 'not in administration' (score: 1): Author: "mgamgb" <mgamgb@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:48:56 +1200; There is hope yet? UK's MG Rover denies applying to go into administration or calling in receivers, following statement from UK Trade and Industry Secretary For more details: http://www.bbcnews.com -; /html/mgs/2005-04/msg00076.html (7,964 bytes)
2. Re: MG Rover 'not in administration' (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:28:38 +0100; The Government jumped the gun by announcing MG Rover had gone into administration, as it is a privately owned company it is for the company to announce it, not the Government, and they still haven't.; /html/mgs/2005-04/msg00084.html (9,160 bytes)
3. Re: MG Rover 'not in administration' (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 04:31:19 -0700 (PDT); I have to agree, Paul, and of course, it isn't the first time the British government has messed with the British auto industry and contributed to it's downfall. In the past, labor has been equally to; /html/mgs/2005-04/msg00085.html (8,874 bytes)
4. Re: MG Rover 'not in administration' (score: 1): Author: eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:25:43 +0930; MEDIA RELEASE from PHOENIX HOLDINGS MG Rover calls on UK Government to decide on loan Today MG Rover called on the Government to make a decision on the bridging loan which will open the way to the ca; /html/mgs/2005-04/msg00087.html (8,161 bytes)
5. Re: MG Rover 'not in administration' (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <ptroot@iaces.com>; Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:43:34 -0500; One of the articles I saw was that the gov't wanted the PVH directors to put up 19 million Pounds.; /html/mgs/2005-04/msg00088.html (8,472 bytes)
6. Re: MG Rover 'not in administration' (score: 1): Author: eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 18:59:30 +0930; Looks like the admin may have finally happened - according to our news here tonight! Eric '68MGB MkII Adelaide, South Australia; /html/mgs/2005-04/msg00089.html (7,367 bytes)
7. Re: MG Rover 'not in administration' (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:52:01 +0100; Yes, which is one step short of receivership. The administrators will try to sell the company as a 'going concern' i.e. as is and to continue production. However since that is what MG Rover themselve; /html/mgs/2005-04/msg00091.html (8,627 bytes)
8. Re: MG Rover 'not in administration' (score: 1): Author: "Mike L" <renoman@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:15:34 -0400; USA federal bankruptcy law treats the priority of creditors in this order: Secured claim by lien, ie a mortgage holder Priority unsecured claims (incl receivers admin fees, employees wages/commission; /html/mgs/2005-04/msg00092.html (8,164 bytes)
9. Re: MG Rover 'not in administration' (score: 1): Author: Larry Hoy <forumaccount@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:46:00 -0600; The Phoenix Consortium is not a US corporation so I suspect the USA Federal Bankruptcy Laws won't apply. Larry Hoy; /html/mgs/2005-04/msg00093.html (7,530 bytes)
10. Re: MG Rover 'not in administration' (score: 1): Author: eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 20:48:32 +0930; .... from the MG-Rover.org people... (if you are there - or want to be there "in spirit")... MG and Rover enthusiasts Rally to the cause Together with our friends across the 'net at XpowerForums, we'; /html/mgs/2005-04/msg00098.html (8,579 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]