- 1. MG V8 conversion (score: 1)
- Author: Tony Bates <tony@batesfamily.net>
- Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 13:25:02 -0800
- Hi All, I am now at the "will it fit" stage with my Rover 4.2 installation in a 1974 chrome bumper MG roadster. My question is what is the distance between the top of the crossmember and the bottom o
- /html/mgb-v8/2002-12/msg00022.html (7,868 bytes)
- 2. Re: MG V8 conversion (score: 1)
- Author: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:16:47 -0000
- If the factory V8 is anything to go by not only the top of the cross-member but the back of it too. It is so close that if the engine mounting plates are used on the wrong sides (they are handed but
- /html/mgb-v8/2002-12/msg00023.html (8,431 bytes)
- 3. Re: MG V8 conversion (score: 1)
- Author: Tony Bates <tony@batesfamily.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 08:16:42 -0800
- Hi Telewest, On my chrome bumper crossmember the rack is approx 1 1/2" above and approx 1" forward of the front of the crossmmeber. If the sump is near "touching" the crossmember, where does the stee
- /html/mgb-v8/2002-12/msg00024.html (9,282 bytes)
- 4. Re: MG V8 conversion (score: 1)
- Author: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:59:05 -0000
- Hi Tony, My rack is more forward than above the crossmember, leaving enough of a gap to get your hand in - or a forearm stuck as a friend found out. The front face of the block i.e. where the front c
- /html/mgb-v8/2002-12/msg00025.html (8,937 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu