- 1. MG and TVR merge? (score: 1)
- Author: <mjanacek@snet.net>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 05:14:22 -0400
- Interesting read: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/57172/tvr_plotting_mg_takeover.html Mike '79B
- /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00018.html (7,276 bytes)
- 2. Re: MG and TVR merge? (score: 1)
- Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kradicke@wishboneclassics.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:51:17 -0400
- Other sources (like PistonHeads) are suggesting no merger, simply that TVR's current owner (the young, 23 year old, Nikolai Smolensky) is putting in a bid under his own name to acquire MG as a sepera
- /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00021.html (7,987 bytes)
- 3. Re: MG and TVR merge? (score: 1)
- Author: RampantNM@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:09:16 EDT
- Interesting read: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/57172/tvr_plotting_mg_takeover.html Mike Looking at the TVR web page just further enforces my plan to spend money restoring and improving my old ca
- /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00023.html (8,402 bytes)
- 4. RE: MG and TVR merge? (score: 1)
- Author: "Gosling, Richard B" <Richard.Gosling@atkinsglobal.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:21:53 +0100
- Robert said: "...Of course I also think they tend to look a little too much like rice rockets..." Really? I really like TVR styling - and one of the reasons is that they don't (to my eyes) look like
- /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00024.html (8,649 bytes)
- 5. Re: MG and TVR merge? (score: 1)
- Author: Barrie Robinson <barrie@look.ca>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 10:19:41 -0700
- I cannot understand why anybody - much less Morgan, would think the Aero was desirable in the styling department. I drool over the 'slab fronts' as well as the later models but the Aero..............
- /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00025.html (9,289 bytes)
- 6. Re: MG and TVR merge? (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul T. Root" <ptroot@iaces.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:44:38 -0500
- I like the idea of MG and TVR "merging". Could be just what MG needs. Focus on low volume and just sports cars. Like Alchemy was going to do before Phoenix pushed in. What engines does TVR use now? W
- /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00026.html (9,142 bytes)
- 7. RE: MG and TVR merge? (score: 1)
- Author: "Gosling, Richard B" <Richard.Gosling@atkinsglobal.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:11:18 +0100
- Paul asked: "...What engines does TVR use now?" TVR have been building their very own engines for quite a few years now. 10 years back they mainly used the venerable old Rover (ex-Buick) V8, albeit s
- /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00029.html (8,346 bytes)
- 8. Re: MG and TVR merge? (score: 1)
- Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:03:04 -0700
- Repeat after me... "They... will... not... sell... MG TFs... in... the... This fantasy keeps popping up on this list, but isn't it time everyone realized that they aren't the only people who have tho
- /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00030.html (8,412 bytes)
- 9. Re: MG and TVR merge? (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul T. Root" <ptroot@iaces.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 11:50:00 -0500
- I was not referring to the MG TF coming to America. I'm hoping for a continuation of a MG car company, and a new model that is designed with coming to America in mind. Some day. Maybe. Let us dream,
- /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00031.html (9,102 bytes)
- 10. Re: MG and TVR merge? (score: 1)
- Author: Brad Wilson <trijagparts@mindspring.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 20:19:01 -0500
- The main reason that MG Rover has not introduced the MGF and TF to the US market is the lack of a dealer network - not a problem for TVR as far as I know? The car largely meets all the safety & emis
- /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00035.html (9,696 bytes)
- 11. Re: MG and TVR merge? (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:47:21 +0100
- Ah well, that is where you could well be wrong. The only reason MG Rover never exported to North America was they simply hadn't got the funding to expand production and produce what would be required
- /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00040.html (8,648 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu