Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MG\s+vs\s+TR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MG\s+vs\s+TR\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. MG vs TR (score: 1): Author: Keith Wheeler <keithw@sand.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 09:46:59 -0800; Yep, here we go again. Personally, I'd say buy the TR-7, *if* you want to spend the effort to fix some major problems. Like the horrid engine. I've got a '77 TR-7, a sunroof coupe, bought for a littl; /html/mgs/1999-01/msg01577.html (8,053 bytes)
2. Re: MG vs TR (score: 1): Author: "Paul Tegler " <wizardz@amdyne.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 13:52:09 -0500; In my last comment ... on MG killing 7's.... killing the spits..... my only beef was the Spitfire not running the races to me (US market) MG and Triumph BOTH BL were like Chevy and Pontiac.... BOTH G; /html/mgs/1999-01/msg01582.html (9,424 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]