- 1. MGA 1600 timing, vacuum advance (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin Sullivan <Kevin.Sullivan@sfo-nichols.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 1995 08:37:59 -0500 (CDT)
- Well, I had set the point gap and static timing correctly and the car ran better than before, but it still felt retarded. I think this engine has a cr of 8.3 to 1. Should it run fine on 87 octane unl
- /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00257.html (7,882 bytes)
- 2. MGA 1600 timing, vacuum advance (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin Sullivan <Kevin.Sullivan@sfo-nichols.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 1995 08:37:59 -0500 (CDT)
- Your interested in plotting vac. advance vs. RPM and want to save $.50 a fill-up to use 87 octane. . . . . . yes. . . I have a suggestion SELL the car!!! Sorry I guess this heat is getting to me! ps:
- /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00259.html (8,395 bytes)
- 3. Re: MGA 1600 timing, vacuum advance (score: 1)
- Author: jurrasm@genesis.torrington.com (Mark Jurras)
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 1995 13:37:51 -0400
- The price of 93 octane fuel in Connecticut is $1.59 (ouch). 87 octane is $1.37 if you save $0.50 using 87 octane that means your tank only holds 2.2 gallons. My 14 gallon tank costs $3 more per fill
- /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00265.html (7,313 bytes)
- 4. Re: MGA 1600 timing, vacuum advance (score: 1)
- Author: jurrasm@genesis.torrington.com (Mark Jurras)
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 1995 13:37:51 -0400
- $3 per tank is still worth the extra. Sorry to hear that it's now that much In CT. I do have a comment about that. . . . . I live there up until 2 years ago, Fairfield county. I couldn't take the hig
- /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00270.html (7,781 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu