- 1. MGA RV8? Not likely... (score: 1)
- Author: todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (Todd Mullins)
- Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 10:14:24 -0500 (CDT)
- You bet it would be interesting, but I'd say there's absolutely no chance of stuffing a RV8 into an MGA without serious sheetmetal alterations. The RV8 takes up the entire width of the MGB's engine b
- /html/mgs/1996-10/msg00020.html (7,235 bytes)
- 2. Re: MGA RV8? Not likely... (score: 1)
- Author: MOMBARI@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 20:47:06 -0400
- Forget putting the V8 in the MGA. You will spend all sorts of time and money only to regret it. Believe me I know, been there, done that. I've put a 350 Olds from a 69 Cutlass into a 64 Cutlass that
- /html/mgs/1996-10/msg00038.html (7,225 bytes)
- 3. Re: MGA RV8? Not likely... (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin Sullivan <kevins@borris.khoros.unm.edu>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 13:59:25 -0600 (MDT)
- Umm. I didn't say I would ever consider doing such a thing. Just wondering if anyone had. My car is completely stock, the way I like it, the way it was meant to be the way it will remain. Like why do
- /html/mgs/1996-10/msg00062.html (7,093 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu