- 1. MGB Bumpers (score: 1)
- Author: "John DiFede" <JDIFEDE@cablevision.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:24:48 -0500
- I've noticed that the front chrome bumper on my '73 MGB hangs (sags?) below the bolts holding the edge of front valance where it attaches to the wing (fender) on either side. On other MGB's I've seen
- /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01230.html (6,544 bytes)
- 2. Re: MGB Bumpers (score: 1)
- Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:10:06 -0800
- Yeah, mine looks like that. too, but I'm sure it should cover the bolts. The bumper fit was so tight originally that it certainly didn't leave any slack for impact absorption! Typically bumpers sag a
- /html/mgs/2001-03/msg01233.html (7,272 bytes)
- 3. Re: MGB Bumpers (score: 1)
- Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 21:59:37 -0800
- I've always been under the impression that Roadster and GT chrome bumpers were the same. All the front chrome bumpers were the same while there were three different rear ones: 1963 thru 1969 and 197
- /html/mgs/1999-12/msg00074.html (9,717 bytes)
- 4. Re: MGB Bumpers (score: 1)
- Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 08:09:41 -0700
- Oops. You are correct. That is what happens when I try to do email during the hectic pace at work. I meant the front fender, not the bumper. Besides, what kind of bumper would sell for $250? I just t
- /html/mgs/1999-12/msg00091.html (10,666 bytes)
- 5. Re: MGB Bumpers (score: 1)
- Author: Chris Attias <cattias@cats.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:02:11 -0800
- I don't know about the difference between roadster and GT bumpers, if there is one, but I did find a rather unique overrider from Moss the last time I ordered. It was a part numbered as a rear overri
- /html/mgs/1999-12/msg00105.html (7,456 bytes)
- 6. Re: MGB Bumpers (score: 1)
- Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 20:45:38 -0700
- Now that I screwed up on the bumpers when I meant fenders. I am fairly certain that the bumpers are identical. The fenders are different because the roadster has a cut in the front fender for the win
- /html/mgs/1999-12/msg00134.html (8,957 bytes)
- 7. Re: MGB Bumpers (score: 1)
- Author: "James H. Nazarian" <microdoc@apk.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 09:03:24 -0500
- IMHO some of us are of the misimpression occasionally that any or all MG parts distributors are supplying parts of different quality and origin. I'm certain that there are some exceptions, but has th
- /html/mgs/1999-12/msg00140.html (11,088 bytes)
- 8. Re: MGB Bumpers (score: 1)
- Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 07:24:15 -0700
- Now I'm worried. I don't remember having these problems until just recently (past couple of years). And it just so happens that I am planning to buy a replacement grille for my 67 BGT in the near fut
- /html/mgs/1999-12/msg00141.html (9,569 bytes)
- 9. Re: MGB Bumpers (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 19:12:44 -0000
- As far as I am aware BMIHT are the only people manufacturing the body shells, but there are loads of companies, in addition to BMIHT, manufacturing individual panels and everything else we can buy 'n
- /html/mgs/1999-12/msg00159.html (12,742 bytes)
- 10. Re: MGB Bumpers (score: 1)
- Author: Carl French <cfrench@cybertours.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 21:27:22 -0500
- I still would like to see the option of buying two levels of chrome. It would be nice for instance to Moss (or someone) sell either quality new chrome bits (which would probably cost twice as much as
- /html/mgs/1999-12/msg00186.html (7,308 bytes)
- 11. Re: MGB Bumpers (score: 1)
- Author: Larry Dickstein <bugide@tfs.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 20:42:01 -0600
- I've found over the years that having a bumper rechromed (regardless of the damage to it) by a reputable shop makes for a more economical deal. When you get it back from the chrome shop it is a good
- /html/mgs/1999-12/msg00188.html (7,865 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu