- 1. MGB Con Rods (score: 1)
- Author: lrc@netcom.com (Henry O. Farad)
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 1995 09:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
- A friend of mine claims that the Con Rods from the 18V motor (with the break perpendicular to the axis) are stronger than the rods from the 18G motor (with the offset break). Anybody care to verify o
- /html/mgs/1995-08/msg00744.html (6,844 bytes)
- 2. Re: MGB Con Rods (score: 1)
- Author: kralmv@ctrvax.Vanderbilt.Edu (Milo V. Kral)
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 1995 07:57:55 -0500 (CDT)
- This isn't to verify or refute, but has anyone ever heard of a connecting rod breaking in any "B" engine? I haven't. Milo Kral Applied and Engineering Sciences Vanderbilt University (615) 322-2756
- /html/mgs/1995-08/msg00752.html (7,011 bytes)
- 3. Re: MGB Con Rods (score: 1)
- Author: lrc@netcom.com (Henry O. Farad)
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 1995 09:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
- Andy Banta, a teammate of mine, has had a couple instances of light seeking rods. Granted they were in his E-Prod race car and I'm only building my motor to about IT specs, but after fragging one mo
- /html/mgs/1995-08/msg00773.html (7,113 bytes)
- 4. Re: MGB Con Rods (score: 1)
- Author: hanz@sybase.com (Hans Huber)
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 95 11:25:08 PDT
- Larry Colen (lrc@netcom.com, aka Henry O. Farad), put forth: from the old Scott Fisher archives (circa 2/91): 18V engines used a modified, and weaker, form of connecting rod with the bearing caps fit
- /html/mgs/1995-08/msg00776.html (7,152 bytes)
- 5. Re: MGB Con Rods (score: 1)
- Author: brooked@bre.co.uk
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 09:13:47 EDT
- As far as I am aware the bit that fails with either type of rod is the bolt or The problem is that afterwards there is such a mess its difficult to know what happened. I had a big end bearing fail at
- /html/mgs/1995-08/msg00786.html (6,942 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu