Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MGB\s+GT\s+Springs\s+on\s+an\s+MGC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MGB\s+GT\s+Springs\s+on\s+an\s+MGC\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. MGB GT Springs on an MGC (score: 1): Author: "James Schulte" <schultejim@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 23:13:39 -0800; I was told that I should order MGB GT springs for my MGC. Is this correct and if not, what should I order? Jim 69C 70B; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00065.html (7,114 bytes)
2. Re: MGB GT Springs on an MGC (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 11:07:59 -0000; There were at least three different spec springs used on MGB GTs over the years, and one of them was used on roadster for a while. Whilst in theory using GT springs on a roadster or RB springs on a C; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00069.html (8,374 bytes)
3. Re: MGB GT Springs on an MGC (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 12:55:41 -0800; I really don' t know myself, but I would check this out before believing it. Thinking it through, while both are heavier than the B roadster, the difference between the two is that the extra weight o; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00076.html (7,885 bytes)
4. Re: MGB GT Springs on an MGC (score: 1): Author: "James Schulte" <schultejim@msn.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 21:16:10 -0800; You may be correct, I know I had a tough time with my 70B regular springs the first 3 months. They really made the car sit up and I had to use sand bags to get it down some, but the rebound straps w; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00083.html (9,325 bytes)
5. Re: MGB GT Springs on an MGC (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 10:15:50 -0000; James - I used red poly bushes together with RB roadster springs on a CB roadster and found the ride very choppy and unpleasant over some surfaces. Eventually I went back to the CB roadster springs b; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00085.html (8,299 bytes)
6. Re: MGB GT Springs on an MGC (score: 1): Author: Lbcnut@aol.com; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 07:48:29 EST; USED rubber bumper springs on a chrome bumper roadster make it sit just right. Some new springs sit too high and may never settle. Old, original springs usually make it sit too low. James; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00087.html (7,262 bytes)
7. RE: MGB GT Springs on an MGC (score: 1): Author: "Larry list account" <list@marketvalue.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 07:53:45 -0700; I think Paul hit on the solution here. If your car is riding nicely, and sits to low in the rear, longer rear shackles would be the solution. They would modifiy the ride height, but not the ride. Lar; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00089.html (7,691 bytes)
8. Re: MGB GT Springs on an MGC (score: 1): Author: "James Schulte" <schultejim@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 20:11:14 -0800; that's great if you are handy like Paul. I'm a buy it off the shelf consumer, if you know what I mean. Time will tell on this conversion. I have one on the passenger side. Having trouble removing th; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00095.html (8,643 bytes)
9. Re: MGB GT Springs on an MGC (score: 1): Author: Lbcnut@aol.com; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 07:18:32 EST; Jim, can you say Sawsall? We used the basic equivalent of one on ours. Took us around 5 minutes for one side. We decided to give it a try because we had spent around 6 hours with misc. dremel stuff,; /html/mgs/2004-12/msg00101.html (7,352 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]