Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MGB\s+Improvements\s+\-\s+makes\s+sense\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MGB\s+Improvements\s+\-\s+makes\s+sense\!\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: MGB Improvements - makes sense! (score: 1): Author: <ptegler@gouldfo.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:40:29 -0500; That really does make sense Lawrie. SU's rely on a bit of vacuum to pull fuel into the carb throat. K&N's (any free flow filter) doesn't 'restrict' enough to create the proper vacuum needed for the c; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00869.html (9,646 bytes)
2. Re: MGB Improvements - makes sense! (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:01:34 -0600; Hmm, maybe that explains why I've been told that one needs to put a richer needle/jet combo in the carbs when switching to K&N filters. Care to comment? TIA, CR /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing lis; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00879.html (7,221 bytes)
3. Re: MGB Improvements - makes sense! (score: 1): Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 02:48:40 +1030; I simply think of it as keeping the balance of the air/fuel mixture you are burning. More air needs more fuel. -- Eric '68MGB MkII Adelaide, South Australia /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list //; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00881.html (7,003 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]