Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MGB\s+rear\s+brakes\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. MGB rear brakes (score: 1)
Author: RJohn50603@aol.com
Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 09:57:40 -0400 (EDT)
To all: I remember a Lucas headlight thread I participated in about a year ago. The essence of the thread was that the Lucas headlights seemed to last forever. I still have both of the original headl
/html/mgs/1997-05/msg00538.html (7,408 bytes)

2. Re: MGB rear brakes (score: 1)
Author: Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 16:30:51 +0000
60k on a set of front pads? I either commend you for your excellent anticipatory driving or condemn you for holding everyone else up by creeping about at 15mph. I consider myself a 'light' brake user
/html/mgs/1997-05/msg00547.html (7,494 bytes)

3. Re: MGB rear brakes (score: 1)
Author: DGallo4663@aol.com
Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 15:16:12 -0400 (EDT)
You mean there are brake shoes in there!!??
/html/mgs/1997-05/msg00556.html (6,575 bytes)

4. Re: MGB rear brakes (score: 1)
Author: "David F. Darby" <darby@tri-lakes.net>
Date: Sun, 11 May 97 23:13:31 PDT
Hello Mr. Johnson: About 70,000 mostly blue highway miles on the current rear shoes on the '67 MGB-GT and still adequate lining (just checked them the other day). Like you, I have wondered about mine
/html/mgs/1997-05/msg00573.html (8,179 bytes)

5. Re: MGB rear brakes (score: 1)
Author: Michael Hartwig <mhartwig@odin.cbu.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 17:25:12 -0600
I really wouldn't worry about it guys. I know that on mountain bikes, the front brakes do about 75% of the braking work. Provided your parking brake works within it's limits I wouldn't give it anothe
/html/mgs/1997-05/msg00622.html (7,368 bytes)

6. Re: MGB rear brakes (score: 1)
Author: RJohn50603@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 23:48:49 -0400 (EDT)
<< 60k on a set of front pads? I either commend you for your excellent anticipatory driving or condemn you for holding everyone else up by creeping about at 15mph. The latter is certainly not the cas
/html/mgs/1997-05/msg00642.html (7,042 bytes)

7. MGB Rear Brakes (score: 1)
Author: fkroeger@Traveller.COM (Fred Kroeger)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 10:00:56 -0500
Hi everyone, I used to lurk about this mailing last last year and quit because I did not have an MG. I have since rectified that situation and now have a 1980 MGB. The car had sat under a tree for qu
/html/mgs/1996-06/msg00996.html (7,224 bytes)

8. Re: MGB Rear Brakes (score: 1)
Author: jtilton@vt.edu (Jay Tilton)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 13:07:20 +0600
A good shop manual will have a pic the assembled rear brake pieces. That's one way to check that you've put it all back together correctly. Maybe a better way is to only do one side at a time so you
/html/mgs/1996-06/msg01004.html (7,607 bytes)

9. Re: MGB Rear Brakes (score: 1)
Author: KILE_PAUL@aphub.aerojetpd.com (Paul D Kile)
Date: 28 Jun 96 12:25:58 PDT
Jay, you questioned the comment that Fred Kroeger made in his rear brake posting "The crossbar is not attached". I think this refers to the handbrake cable not being attached to the levers at the rea
/html/mgs/1996-06/msg01013.html (7,173 bytes)

10. Re: MGB Rear Brakes (score: 1)
Author: jtilton@vt.edu (Jay Tilton)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 16:28:32 +0600
Aha! How silly of me not to remember that. If that's what you meant, Fred, I can see the reason for adding the comment--implies that there can be no tension at all on the lever. Well...almost right.
/html/mgs/1996-06/msg01015.html (7,729 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu