Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MGB\s+shakes\s+between\s+55\-65\s+$self\s+shaking\s+v\.s\.\s+bumpy\s+road$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MGB\s+shakes\s+between\s+55\-65\s+$self\s+shaking\s+v\.s\.\s+bumpy\s+road$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: MGB shakes between 55-65 (self shaking v.s. bumpy road) (score: 1): Author: "Bob D." <bobmgtd@insightbb.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 18:56:42 -0500; My B has always been pretty well shake-free. Maybe when everything is "right" on the B, and the road is smooth, there is nothing to excite the resonant vibration. But get on a bumpy road, and there y; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00116.html (9,191 bytes)
2. Re: MGB shakes between 55-65 (self shaking v.s. bumpy road) (score: 1): Author: Bob Howard <mgbob@juno.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 10:01:18 -0400; I suspect that 'shakes' has different meanings to different people. To me, it's the rattle-rattle-rattle, or the bump-bump-bump that you were describing before. It's a repetitive event. By that defi; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00126.html (10,416 bytes)
3. Re: MGB shakes between 55-65 (self shaking v.s. bumpy road) (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2002 13:09:10 -0500; Although I don't have the Andrex shocks, I do have a front sway bar on my TD. It made the car more neutral and it has a lot less under steer. I like it much better. Blake /// or try http://www.team.; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00133.html (7,169 bytes)
4. Re: MGB shakes between 55-65 (self shaking v.s. bumpy road) (score: 1): Author: Bob Howard <mgbob@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 14:58:47 -0400; I have seen sway bars on TDs but have not driven a car fitted with one, so I appreciate your comment on the understeer improvement. The Andrex dampers, if tightened so they work, would probably prov; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00145.html (7,779 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]