Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MGC\s+\&\s+Crank\s+Pulley\:\s+Greater\s+Specifidity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MGC\s+\&\s+Crank\s+Pulley\:\s+Greater\s+Specifidity\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. MGC & Crank Pulley: Greater Specifidity (score: 1): Author: Robert Allen <boballen@sky.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 00:20:58 +0100; [ Bob Allen slinks back up to podium after most have left the Just to clarify a couple of points: Point 1: I said I used 'red' Loctite on the bearing surfaces of the pulley and 'blue' Loctite on the; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00409.html (9,272 bytes)
2. Re: MGC & Crank Pulley: Greater Specifidity (score: 1): Author: EMILY COWEN <ecowen@cln.etc.bc.ca>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 02:48:03 -0700 (PDT); Hi Bob Allen!! We haven't left yet, we're just hiding. Time to go and grab a beer while the print scrolls down the screen... This is when ole "mr. blue wrench" comes in handy, NOT your average propan; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00413.html (9,821 bytes)
3. Re: MGC & Crank Pulley: Greater Specifidity (score: 1): Author: todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (Todd Mullins); Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 09:01:54 -0500 (CDT); I don't know nuttin' 'bout no 'Cs, but what are you doing UNDER the car?!? With torques that large, I'm gonna be topside, fershur. Besides, that's what they make daily drivers for. You just swing the; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00422.html (8,542 bytes)
4. Re: MGC & Crank Pulley: Greater Specifidity (score: 1): Author: Rich Mason <rmason@ro.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 08:10:01 -0500; I thought it was a well established fact that RCH was much finer than BCH. Maybe a survey is in order? Rich Mason '73 MGB __________________________________________ MG Page-> http://ro.com/~rmason/mg; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00423.html (7,800 bytes)
5. Re: MGC & Crank Pulley: Greater Specifidity (score: 1): Author: todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (Todd Mullins); Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 09:28:28 -0500 (CDT); It's my understanding that the main difficulty with RCH is the temperament. The manufacturing process for RCH uses very stringent tolerances, such that the slightest miscalculation during production; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00424.html (8,387 bytes)
6. Re: MGC & Crank Pulley: Greater Specifidity (score: 1): Author: Dave Houser <mgs4dave@warwick.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 14:29:19 +0000; Au contraire, mes amis. An RCH is most definitely a coaser grade than the BCH, which is at the other end of the scale. To avoid problems, use the middle of the road, BRCH for most settings. Dave Hous; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00441.html (7,425 bytes)
7. Re: MGC & Crank Pulley: Greater Specifidity (score: 1): Author: EMILY COWEN <ecowen@cln.etc.bc.ca>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 13:14:43 -0700 (PDT); Hi Rich Mason!! Well, you must remember that the "B" encompasses blonde, brown, and black; in that order... TTUL8r, Kirk Cowen; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00452.html (7,501 bytes)
8. Re: MGC & Crank Pulley: Greater Specifidity (score: 1): Author: pbailey <pbailey@qnet.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 13:53:38 -0700; The most accurate is VFBCH....VF=very fine; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00455.html (7,213 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]