Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MGF\s+in\s+America\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MGF\s+in\s+America\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. RE: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: Chris Kotting <ckotting@iwaynet.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 08:00:13 -0400; C'mon folks, the reason BMW decided that the MGF wouldn't be imported to the US isn't emissions and safety (it's already compliant with European standards that are the same as US Federal standards),; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00496.html (7,585 bytes)
2. Re: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: Tomsjetta@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 09:27:29 EDT; This matter was discussed in the June/July issue of MG World. Some listers may not have access to this magazine, so I'll put an end to this rumor before it gets too far out of hand: The following are; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00501.html (8,403 bytes)
3. RE: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: Andrew Lundgren <lundgren@iname.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 09:47:04 -0600 (MDT); I don't agree with this one, a BMW in the states is the car for those with $. They wouldn't want an MG because it doesn't say BMW on it. On complaint I have heard about the $40k 'vette is that it is; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00514.html (8,199 bytes)
4. RE: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: John Walker <john@rmartin.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 08:49:35 -0700; First of all I believe that what you meant to say was the Z3. The M3 is a sport sedan, not a roadster and would not be a proper comparison. Secondly, .....What? What does BMW care which car in their; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00515.html (8,940 bytes)
5. Re: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: Rocky Frisco <rock@rocky-frisco.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 13:13:41 -0500; Saw a bright red some-kind-of BMW, day before yesterday, here in Tulsa. Looked like a Z3 but with a semi-stationwagon fastback body. I found it to be very ugly. I rather like the bodystyle of the Z3,; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00524.html (8,592 bytes)
6. Re: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 14:52:53 EDT; << Saw a bright red some-kind-of BMW, day before yesterday, here in Tulsa. Looked like a Z3 but with a semi-stationwagon fastback body. I found it to be very ugly. >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Th; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00525.html (7,930 bytes)
7. Re: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: Larry Macy <macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 14:56:12 -0400; Not sure what they call it but it is their version of a BGT. I sat in one at the BMW show a few weeks ago. I was impressed - I thought it looked cool. IMHO Larry At this exact moment in time 9/10/99; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00526.html (9,410 bytes)
8. RE: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 12:02:05 -0700; C'mon folks again. The only reason that the MGF was not imported to America is that in the long term it was not deemed advantageous to the companies goals. The reasoning is highly fluid and no doubt; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00530.html (8,696 bytes)
9. RE: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: Larry Macy <macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 15:55:06 -0400; rant mode on Sheesh there is nothing like flogging a dead horse. This is what, like the 5th or 6th time this discussion has happened in the last year? The MGF is NOT coming to America. Get over it. W; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00534.html (9,902 bytes)
10. RE: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: John Walker <john@rmartin.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 13:09:04 -0700; I believe this time the start of the thread had nothing to do with the 'F' specifically. Neither did many of the posts. I know that I for one was saying that BMW would be silly not to import an MG in; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00535.html (9,058 bytes)
11. Re: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:54:20 EDT; Tough day in the psych department, Larry? Take it easy. What you need is a day in the woods with your Midget. It'll bring that ole blood pressure right back down. Have a nice weekend camping! Allen H; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00538.html (8,147 bytes)
12. Re: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: Andrew Lundgren <lundgren@iname.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 21:30:07 -0600 (MDT); I thought it looked like a BGT!; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00562.html (8,897 bytes)
13. Re: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 20:40:27 -0700; What you saw was a Z3 Coupe. Many writers have compared it to the MGB-GT. Actually, I think one magazine implied that the designer was inspired by the MGB-GT. But we know which one is better looking.; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00563.html (9,063 bytes)
14. Re: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: Art Pfenninger <ch155@freenet.buffalo.edu>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 21:25:30 -0400 (EDT); I saw the Z3 fastback and thought the same thing, what an ugly car. Good look when they try to sell it. It reminded me of a American Motors Hornet!; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00630.html (8,887 bytes)
15. RE: MGF in America (score: 1): Author: James Nazarian Jr <James.Nazarian@Colorado.EDU>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 15:05:33 -0600 (MDT); I started it this time and it was because of something I read in European Car about MG returning to the US in 2003. To those who are sick of reading about this, how do you expect MG to know we want t; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg00678.html (7,968 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]