- 1. Magazines = facts? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 04:06:46 EDT
- Stuff printed in magazines are not facts any more than 150mph E-types were facts when they were road tested by magazines. Daniel1312 << 1500 owners point to facts, >>
- /html/spridgets/2000-09/msg00880.html (7,202 bytes)
- 2. Re: Magazines = facts? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 04:31:52 -0400
- Ok guys, this is REALLY missing the point and picking on meaningless surrounding details. I am not saying that everything printed by magazines is true, but really, what "secret motif" would a Septemb
- /html/spridgets/2000-09/msg00881.html (9,682 bytes)
- 3. Re: Magazines = facts? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1904 14:47:16 -0500
- Two things: 1. The Euro-spec 1500 had much more power 2. The 1500 Midget weighs quite a bit more than most 1275/1098/948 So, for people in NA, the question is: does the increased power of a US-choak
- /html/spridgets/2000-09/msg00900.html (11,103 bytes)
- 4. Re: Magazines = facts? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 19:23:54 -0500
- This reasoning then leads me to believe that the TR7 must be even better as it has a larger engine yet??!! And to think I had one given to me that I wouldn't take, stupid me!!
- /html/spridgets/2000-09/msg00916.html (8,164 bytes)
- 5. Re: Magazines = facts? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 22:04:16 -0700
- You can't go with engine size for speed, its very possible that a smaller engine makes a car go faster than a bigger engine. You would hope that is not the case but engine size is not everything. A f
- /html/spridgets/2000-09/msg00924.html (8,928 bytes)
- 6. Re: Magazines = facts? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 00:07:46 -0500
- Along with agreeing with Mr. Bug Writer (I just took a ride in a 1308cc turbo car that runs about 5-5.2 to 60 mph :), I have to say I see no purpose whatsoever to this argument. It's like fighting ov
- /html/spridgets/2000-09/msg00925.html (9,676 bytes)
- 7. Re: Magazines = facts? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 00:52:27 -0000charset="iso-8859-1"
- yup! can't agree more. the old addage there is no replacement for cubic dollars sort of fits here too! proper final drive ratios can make a rambler do wheel stands with a asthmatic 6 cylinder. or tak
- /html/spridgets/2000-09/msg00926.html (11,494 bytes)
- 8. Re: Magazines = facts? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 23:49:53 -0700
- Make that a TR8 Brad. Aluminum block/heads (very) small block V-8; S & G's! :)
- /html/spridgets/2000-09/msg00928.html (8,781 bytes)
- 9. Re: Magazines = facts? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 10:50:39 +0100charset="iso-8859-1"
- 88.6237 percent of all statistics are made up (Vic Reeves english commedian (?))
- /html/spridgets/2000-09/msg00933.html (7,649 bytes)
- 10. Re: Magazines = facts? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 10:46:08 -0700charset="iso-8859-1"
- What increase in power? The UK 1500 has 66hp, the 1275 (1967) has 65hp, The US 1500 has 55 or 50hp, right? But as it has been said, torque is what wins the drag race, the US 1500 has 67 ft-lb at 250
- /html/spridgets/2000-09/msg00953.html (12,608 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu