Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Meant\s+oil\s+pan\s+baffle\s+not\s+windage\s+tray\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Meant\s+oil\s+pan\s+baffle\s+not\s+windage\s+tray\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Meant oil pan baffle not windage tray (score: 1): Author: Chuck Arnold <chuck.arnold@oracle.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 13:41:11 -0700; Earlier today I sent a message regarding size/placement of the "windage tray" for a TR6. I really meant the oil pan baffle. Should this baffle end end to end and side to side at the 3" mark on the oi; /html/fot/2003-07/msg00207.html (7,633 bytes)
2. Re: Meant oil pan baffle not windage tray (score: 1): Author: "Charly Mitchel" <charly@mitchelplumbing.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:46:32 -0700; Chuck, check the fitment of the baffle and the windage tray. The oil pump and the dipstick didn't line up and I had to modify the holes a little to make it fit properly. I think the dipstick hole was; /html/fot/2003-07/msg00209.html (9,003 bytes)
3. Re: Meant oil pan baffle not windage tray (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:55:07 -0700; I just looked at hat drawing in the prep manula. This is not my work. This drawing was added afer I left the company and they had someone throw this drawing into the book. This dosen't help you at al; /html/fot/2003-07/msg00211.html (9,246 bytes)
4. RE: Meant oil pan baffle not windage tray (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:28:31 -0700; Naturally there are many schools of thought on baffles. A lot of people like to keeep the maximum amount of oil around the pickup. this calls for close-fitting baffles and a one-way door. Others don'; /html/fot/2003-07/msg00213.html (10,151 bytes)
5. RE: Meant oil pan baffle not windage tray (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 23:25:28 -0700; I did a little google search and couldn't find it. I'll look a little bit more tomorrow. I don't remember how I came across them, but they were very interesting. I'd never thought that much about how; /html/fot/2003-07/msg00214.html (11,408 bytes)
6. Re: Meant oil pan baffle not windage tray (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 08:56:09 -0700; I made a valve cover and an oil pan once with a plastic window, the idea of viewing thehappenings of the oil in the engine. It's such an oil storm you can't see anything but a lot of disturbed oil sp; /html/fot/2003-07/msg00219.html (14,103 bytes)
7. RE: Meant oil pan baffle not windage tray (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:00:47 -0700; That's kind of what this looked like except they had some kind of high-speed stop action strobe. It was on a site that also showed modern dry sump technology--isolated sumps (one per cylinder), one; /html/fot/2003-07/msg00227.html (7,513 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]