Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Mechanical\s+vs\s+electrical\s+instrumentation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Mechanical\s+vs\s+electrical\s+instrumentation\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Mechanical vs electrical instrumentation (score: 1): Author: "Bill Sohl" <billsohl@mindspring.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 14:54:21 -0400; So which is better? Mechanical gauge, mechanical capillary tube and sensor or.... Electrical gauge, one wire and sensor. Seems like with today's electronics, the electrical should win out in terms of; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00227.html (8,761 bytes)
2. RE: Mechanical vs electrical instrumentation (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 15:26:49 -0700; Problem is, it's difficult to keep instrumentation purely in the electronic realm. The usual way of building an oil pressure sender, for example, is something very similar to a mechanical gage movem; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00231.html (8,028 bytes)
3. Re: Mechanical vs electrical instrumentation (score: 1): Author: "jaboruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:29:23 -0400; My experience is that electric gauges will not take as much abuse, such as getting wet, vibration, leaning on when trying to do something else behind the dashboard, etc. I personnally stick with mech; /html/fot/2002-09/msg00268.html (9,968 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]