- 1. Re: More Fiero - CS and Miata 1.6l (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:42:01 -0700
- OK, let's also stop comparing the Miata 1.6 --> 1.8 situation to the Fiero 1985 through 1987 --> 1988. The Miata 1.6 was not moved because there was a large contingent of people asking for it. It was
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00889.html (9,852 bytes)
- 2. Re: More Fiero - CS and Miata 1.6l (score: 1)
- Author: jwalter@ptra.com
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 23:16:28 -0500
- See, Andy we do agree. ;-) And maybe everyone will accept your answer as "the FINAL answer". At the Mineral Wells divisional the MR2 of Jimmie Stewart was king to several 1.6's. Couldn't happen to a
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00906.html (7,331 bytes)
- 3. Re: More Fiero - CS and Miata 1.6l (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Foster" <pfoster@gdi.net>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:08:52 -0400
- <<<OK, let's also stop comparing the Miata 1.6 --> 1.8 situation to the Fiero 1985 through 1987 --> 1988. The Miata 1.6 was not moved because there was a large contingent of people asking for it. It
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00930.html (8,644 bytes)
- 4. Re: More Fiero - CS and Miata 1.6l (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:08:24 -0700
- <deep breath> Let's take your BMW example. Many people have stated that there isn't a class worth of difference between the 1.6l Miata and the 1.8 or Sport version in 1999. If that is the case then y
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00935.html (9,797 bytes)
- 5. Re: More Fiero - CS and Miata 1.6l (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Foster" <pfoster@gdi.net>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:25:41 -0400
- <counts slowly to 10> isn't a class version in 1999. and CS were what class doesn't fit designed. So BS is the expensive class and CS is the inexpensive class? I don't consider $23K (for a new one)
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00937.html (9,493 bytes)
- 6. Re: More Fiero - CS and Miata 1.6l (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 15:33:08 EDT
- << You don't appear to be classing cars based on relative autocross potential anymore, but more on some sort of demographic approach coupled with value judgement. So if BMW made a sports car that cos
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00978.html (8,335 bytes)
- 7. Re: More Fiero - CS and Miata 1.6l (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Foster" <pfoster@gdi.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:18:38 -0400
- CHD responds: The 1.6 either competition and don't $40,000 and shows time. I fail to see why any "cherry picker" car is acceptable no matter what the cost. There have been plenty of low-cost examples
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg01068.html (8,105 bytes)
- 8. Re: More Fiero - CS and Miata 1.6l (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Foster" <pfoster@gdi.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:44:42 -0400
- CHD responds: The 1.6 either competition and don't $40,000 and shows time. Then why aren't the slower CS cars moved to DS? Could it be that someone with the initials of CHD proposed the concept that
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg01071.html (8,009 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu