Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*More\s+Power\s+from\s+the\s+1725\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*More\s+Power\s+from\s+the\s+1725\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: "Barbara Blue" <the_blues@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 19:03:08 -0500; In amongst the parts, spares, and old pieces of chewing gum that came with my first car was a reprint of an article (source unknown) seemingly titled "Chrysler 1600/1725" by David Vizard. I am going; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00159.html (8,829 bytes)
2. RE: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: Jarrid Gross <JGross@econolite.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 16:39:03 -0800; Yeah but you loose compression here. To make up for the loss in compression due to combustion chamber mods. over Totally disagree here, constant depression carbs are more restrictive than convention; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00160.html (10,230 bytes)
3. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: "Greg Locke" <glocke@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 13:34:04 +1300; Hi Bill Please send me this article. My address is 8 Griffin Ave, Epsom, Auckland, New Zealand. I ported my head according to David Vizards instructions (from his book "Theory and Practice of Cylinde; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00162.html (10,481 bytes)
4. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: "Barbara Blue" <the_blues@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 20:46:18 -0500; Did you alter the combustion chamber? In this article he claims that is where the hp is, not in proting. I am going to see if we can successfully scan this thing and send it out by E-mail. Will take; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00164.html (12,213 bytes)
5. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: "Barbara Blue" <the_blues@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 20:40:02 -0500; Yep, Mr. Vizard admitted you loose compression reshaping the combustion chamber. He claims the object is to make hp, not have a high compression, so it is more than worth the trade off. Webbers expen; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00165.html (12,721 bytes)
6. Fw: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: "Greg Locke" <glocke@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:17:30 +1300; successfully book have twin of you came of modified camshaft! and confusing,; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00167.html (14,372 bytes)
7. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: MrZAG57@aol.com; Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 23:16:38 EST; << You can bore well over .040, (as per MR ZAG) just a custom head gasket will be required. >> Careful now, I don't know nothin' ( Remember?) ZAG; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00173.html (8,210 bytes)
8. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: MrZAG57@aol.com; Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 23:20:11 EST; << I'd say that a 150BHP alpine motor would cost at least $5000. >> This I DO KNOW... at least $5,000.00 Assuming you had a solid block and crank with no flaws that cost you nothing. ZAG; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00174.html (8,386 bytes)
9. RE: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Hill" <tom.hill@att.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 09:56:58 -0600; The combustion chamber mods recommended by Vizard are very similar to the difference between the standard and Holbay cylinder heads. The compression ratio lost due to the increase in chamber volume c; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00177.html (14,809 bytes)
10. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: Christopher.Albers@bubbs.biola.edu (Christopher Albers); Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 07:27:47 -0800; If anyone cares, I paid Taylor Engines, a very reputable shop in Whittier, CA (he does all of Jay Leno's Duesy engines, I even saw one of the heads in his shop. A work of art!!), about $450 in labor; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00178.html (9,239 bytes)
11. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: Christopher.Albers@bubbs.biola.edu (Christopher Albers); Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 07:32:47 -0800; I can say from experience that this cam pretty much poops out over 6000, maybe even a little less. CNA; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00180.html (8,848 bytes)
12. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: "Barbara Blue" <the_blues@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 22:20:05 -0500; The mail list is getting somewhat long, but as they say "That's what happens when you let your alligator mouth overload you hummingbird ass". The computer genius has agreed to try to get his scanner; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00197.html (9,834 bytes)
13. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: Victor Hughes <v.hughes@student.canberra.edu.au>; Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 15:59:00 +1100; Forced induction whether by mechanical supercharger or exhaust driven turbocharger does give a motor higher compression because it forces fuel/air in. The more fuel/air, the bigger the bang at igniti; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00199.html (9,511 bytes)
14. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: sosnaenergyconsulting@home.com; Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 06:43:33 -0800; Y'know, Smitty has a Holbay head and we were puzzling over the smaller intake ports recently. He thought that going from a large carb opening to a small intake port would increase the velocity of the; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00203.html (10,813 bytes)
15. RE: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Hill" <tom.hill@att.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 08:57:39 -0600; I had the same discussion with Smitty when I bought my Holbay setup. When I talked to my engine builder about the port differences, he smiled and said, "its right the opposite of what we always thoug; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00204.html (11,616 bytes)
16. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: "Louis & Laila" <bwana@c2i2.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 03:32:29 -0800; The reason the ports on the Holbay head are smaller is to increase low end torque. It is correct that smaller ports increase the velocity of the fuel air mixture, as in Bournoulli's theorom "when a g; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00215.html (13,651 bytes)
17. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: GSTROM99@aol.com; Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 19:03:43 EST; generally better able to cope with this than those with 3 mains. Isn't the 5 bearing crank cast? I think the 3 bearing forged crank may make up for the difference. What'd ya think? gary; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00221.html (8,302 bytes)
18. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: "Barbara Blue" <the_blues@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 07:54:37 -0500; Vic, I decided to dig out my copy of "The Sports Car". I had forgotten what a delight it is to read. I decided to copy an introductory paragraph about supercharging because I think everyone will enjo; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00226.html (11,802 bytes)
19. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: Ron Tebo <tebomr@cadvision.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 05:20:56 -0700; The 5 main bearing crank is nodular cast iron and would probably be less flexible than the 3 bearing crank both because of the extra bearings and because of the material and manufacture. However the; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00240.html (8,572 bytes)
20. Re: More Power from the 1725 (score: 1): Author: Jarrid Gross <jarrid_gross@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:40:30 -0800; The forged 3 main would appear to be a wash as compared to the cast 5 main, but I would submit that the rootes works teames did suffer failures from broken cranks running the 1592. I dont recall hear; /html/alpines/2001-03/msg00241.html (8,348 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]