- 1. More Seat Belts. (score: 1)
- Author: "Stu Brennan" <stubrennan@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:49:22 -0500
- I've been doing a bit of research on seat belt angles, and this evening a lot of things came together. After I replied to Bob Nersesian's note, of course. The snail mail brought a copy of a page inst
- /html/tigers/2004-03/msg00003.html (7,610 bytes)
- 2. Re: More Seat Belts. (score: 1)
- Author: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:15:55 -0700
- The main concern with shoulder belt angles is to ensure that they don't cause spinal compression in a severe impact - what you really want is for the shoulder belt strap to be perpendicular to the sp
- /html/tigers/2004-03/msg00005.html (7,537 bytes)
- 3. RE: More Seat Belts. (score: 1)
- Author: rhoefle@ctlinc.com
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:10:04 -0500
- Theo wrote: "The lap belt must be positioned to give good resistance to submarining (which means that having it nearly vertical is bad - you can slide forwards quite a ways before the belts begin to
- /html/tigers/2004-03/msg00007.html (7,236 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu