Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*More\s+Tires\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*More\s+Tires\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. More Tires (score: 1): Author: Malaboge@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 15:51:39 EDT; Not to beat a dead horse....but Has anyone used both Yoko 008's and BFG comp TA R1's? I think that I've distilled my choices down to these two, but have used neither. Anyone with comparison experienc; /html/fot/1999-06/msg00070.html (7,122 bytes)
2. Re: More Tires (score: 1): Author: MHKitchen@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 16:56:37 EDT; Having tried both, I prefer the BFG's on the Cortina. I've just bought a set of Kuhmo's to try up North in a few weeks. Just went through the same exercise and narrowed it down to BFGs and Kuhmos. M; /html/fot/1999-06/msg00073.html (6,877 bytes)
3. Re: More Tires (score: 1): Author: "Ron Schonscheck" <schonny@Y2consult.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 20:18:54 -0600; Just installed a set of Kuhmo's and after the first weekend, very impressed! --Original Message-- From: Malaboge@aol.com <Malaboge@aol.com> To: fot@autox.team.net <fot@autox.team.net>; vintage-race@a; /html/fot/1999-06/msg00078.html (7,803 bytes)
4. RE: More Tires (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 20:01:58 -0700; This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --_=_NextPart_001_01BEBC5B.9D263870 Content-Type: text/plain; c; /html/fot/1999-06/msg00079.html (11,230 bytes)
5. Re: More Tires (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:04:12 -0700; What is it that you like about the BFGs? Do they handle more predictably, give faster lap times or stick or brake better? set; /html/fot/1999-06/msg00080.html (7,459 bytes)
6. Re: More Tires (score: 1): Author: "John A. Rollins" <nobozos@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 05:45:19 -0700; I have used both the 008s and the BFG R1s on my 911s and can offer the following comparisons. The grip was similar between the two with the BFGs being better in the wet (it does rain in Southern Flo; /html/fot/1999-06/msg00082.html (8,120 bytes)
7. Re: More Tires (score: 1): Author: MHKitchen@aol.com; Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:02:42 EDT; << What is it that you like about the BFGs? Do they handle more predictably, give faster lap times or stick or brake better? I guess what I like best is the handling predictability. They stick well,; /html/fot/1999-06/msg00090.html (8,830 bytes)
8. More Tires (score: 1): Author: Malaboge@aol.com; Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 15:49:58 EDT; Fellow Rubber Ruiners The other night I rolled out-o-bed in the middle of the night with a bad case of "hot coppers" if you know what I mean...found a bottle of V8 juice...looks ok, no floating stuff; /html/fot/1999-05/msg00236.html (6,965 bytes)
9. Re: More Tires (score: 1): Author: "Jim & Ann Brown" <thebrowns@pdq.net>; Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 16:54:07 -0500; I am running Avon Turbospeed 6.00 v 16 tires on my 1948 Bentley Special. I did not choose them intelligently -- they were on the car when I purchased her in England. I have had no complaints with th; /html/fot/1999-05/msg00237.html (8,254 bytes)
10. Re: More Tires (score: 1): Author: "Baxter Culver" <peyote222@email.msn.com>; Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 19:21:46 -0700; Nick in Nor Cal-- I haven't run with CSRG for a couple of years but WHEN I last ran, they were kinda specific about tires. Seems there was a bit of a "spec" tire controversy going on then. I would su; /html/fot/1999-05/msg00239.html (8,021 bytes)
11. Re: More Tires (score: 1): Author: "jonmac" <jonmac@ndirect.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 23:53:10 +0100; Nick Can't help you with the vintage race aspects of Avons. However, they've been seen as standard fitting as a road-going tyre on Aston Martin (I think) Rolls Royce and Bentley for years. There are; /html/fot/1999-05/msg00241.html (7,218 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]