- 1. Re: More Twincam Figures (score: 1)
- Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:01:16 EDT
- << Twin Cam MKII MGB Datsun 240Z 1588cc 1622cc 1796cc 2393cc 0-30 2.7 4.0 3.9 3.2 0-40 4.8 6.0 5.9 4.9 0-50 7.3 9.3 9.0 6.6 0-60 9.9 12.8 12.5 8.7 0-70 13.8 18.0 17.7 11.8 0-80 18.1 25.4 25.0 15.2 0-
- /html/mgs/2000-06/msg00466.html (9,620 bytes)
- 2. Re: More Twincam Figures (score: 1)
- Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 20:40:30 -0700
- Sorry, the table formatting seems to have gotten all screwed up on the additional data points... maybe it's just me. I did try a monospace font, though. WSpohn4@aol.com had this to say: -- Max Heim '
- /html/mgs/2000-06/msg00475.html (6,811 bytes)
- 3. Re: More Twincam Figures (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Quirt <quirt@sk.sympatico.ca>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 19:23:22 -0600
- Now you're in my other territory Bill!! While I have only driven my 150S for several miles over the last 15 years due to the multitude of missing parts, I did hit an indicated 125 mph in overdrive wi
- /html/mgs/2000-06/msg00533.html (7,846 bytes)
- 4. Re: More Twincam Figures (score: 1)
- Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 21:42:06 -0700
- Perhaps the following will explain why an MGA Twin Cam can sometimes beat a Jaguar on the track. Blake The following quote is from "MGA 1500, 1600, Twin Cam" by F. Wilson McComb, copy right 1983 by O
- /html/mgs/2000-06/msg00536.html (9,129 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu