- 1. More about MSCC vs Christine Healey (score: 1)
- Author: Jeremy Edwards <jeremy@jmemee.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 22:21:33 +0100
- Now I have the Judgement from the Employment Tribunal, I have tried to post it to the list 3 times and it has not appeared- I'd guess that a wise soul has put a limit to the size of postings. Kevin L
- /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00019.html (8,170 bytes)
- 2. Re: More about MSCC vs Christine Healey (score: 1)
- Author: Colin Cobb <cobmeister@zianet.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 17:28:34 -0600
- Hey Jeremy, Thanks for following up and obtaining this decision. Fascinatin' stuff, but oh so depressing... Everybody wound up losers in this deal, an unfortunate series of screw ups that your club w
- /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00020.html (7,846 bytes)
- 3. More about MSCC vs Christine Healey (score: 1)
- Author: Jeremy Edwards <jeremy@jmemee.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 23:59:04 +0100
- I hope that by now most of you have had the opportunity to read the Tribunal Judgement, either mailed out by me or on the ManxMog web site http://homepages.enterprise.net/kluff/manxmog/trib.html I wo
- /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00074.html (11,639 bytes)
- 4. RE: More about MSCC vs Christine Healey (score: 1)
- Author: "Manfred Brown" <m-brown@dircon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 10:32:35 +0100
- Many thanks for posting this and the judgement - I hadn't realised the half of it. I'll try to attend the AGM if possible - my first in 16 years membership. Do you suggest we formally raise the issue
- /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00081.html (12,736 bytes)
- 5. Re: More about MSCC vs Christine Healey (score: 1)
- Author: "Ernest(Chip) Brown" <ebrown@ms.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 09:22:48 -0400
- Those of you who are MSCC members should read this brief, which to this non-lawyer American's sensibilities is an interesting document indeed. It isn't full of legalese, reads like it was written by
- /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00083.html (8,849 bytes)
- 6. RE: More about MSCC vs Christine Healey (score: 1)
- Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 10:58:06 -0400
- Thanks for making this judgment available to us. A sorry state of affairs indeed. I quit the MSCC some years ago, as the benefit/cost ratio to me was approaching zero. I do remember the neatly handw
- /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00087.html (14,466 bytes)
- 7. Re: More about MSCC vs Christine Healey (score: 1)
- Author: "David P. Crandall" <davidc@netwrk.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 14:59:55 -0400
- Jeremy-I found the judgement almost as entertaining to read [if distressing] as Harry Potter; that is, its straightforward, no-holds-barred rhetoric gave a very clear picture of a badly handled perso
- /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00088.html (9,571 bytes)
- 8. Re: More about MSCC vs Christine Healey (score: 1)
- Author: Jeremy Edwards <jeremy@jmemee.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 22:30:40 +0100
- My last one was John Worrall's departure- mea culpa Yes, a question to the AGM would be suitable. I'll need to check the Memorandum and Articles of the company for the correct form of notice, if ther
- /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00089.html (9,084 bytes)
- 9. Re: More about MSCC vs Christine Healey (score: 1)
- Author: Jeremy Edwards <jeremy@jmemee.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 22:46:39 +0100
- I have had only one communication on the subject from the Chairman Phil Hawes, dated 6 September 1999. My reply by snail mail on the 8 September asked for his permission to put it on the web. I have
- /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00090.html (8,509 bytes)
- 10. Re: More about MSCC vs Christine Healey (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Nogueira <nogera@prodigy.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 99 22:27:06 -0500
- -- [ From: Bob Nogueira * EMC.Ver #3.1a ] -- Chip Your right about it being interesting and not full of legalese. This is the second British legal opinion that I've read that was in many ways more in
- /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00124.html (8,762 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu