Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*More\s+confounding\s+ride\s+height\s+nonsense\!\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*More\s+confounding\s+ride\s+height\s+nonsense\!\!\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. More confounding ride height nonsense!!! (score: 1): Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:57:08 -0700; As I continue to deal with "my" ride height issue I am finding some very interesting things. The Tiger, likely due to it's short wheel base is very sensitive to weight distribution. When I first saw; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00163.html (13,513 bytes)
2. Re: More confounding ride height nonsense!!! (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 15:48:18 EDT; You mention the 10 1/2" springs. My originals were 12" and the replacements from CAT were 10 1/2" . With the shorter springs, the car definitely has a "down hill" look. I can't figure out what is go; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00164.html (6,969 bytes)
3. Re: More confounding ride height nonsense!!! (score: 1): Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 15:44:32 -0700; Yea, I noticed the difference (12" vs 10-1/2") too but I think the stiffer springs make up for most of the free length size. The weird thing is that I put both springs in the same location (seperate; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00166.html (9,398 bytes)
4. Re: More confounding ride height nonsense!!! (score: 1): Author: VegasLegal@aol.com; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 11:26:15 -0400; Dear Wittsend: A suggestion and solution. Find a 1981 song written by Shaw and performed by Styx, and listen carefully. (A joke and a puzzle that apparently and ironically applies to me as well). Bob; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00169.html (6,813 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]