- 1. More on Sequential classes (score: 1)
- Author: Ben Thatcher <bthatch@juno.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:56:27 -0400
- Roger sez: I'm not sure what this has to do with the discussion about SCCA sequential classing. BTW, I'm not wild about NCCC classing, either. A marque club's needs are different from SCCA. I doubt
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00269.html (9,208 bytes)
- 2. Re: More on Sequential classes (score: 1)
- Author: Alan Dahl <adahl@eskimo.com>
- Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 08:47:54 -0700
- No, the flaw is that Shauna Marinus, Teresa Niedel, Lynn Rothney-Kozlak, Kay Bailey or any of the many, many fast ladies out there would just kick the rears of all of the guys in the lower class. Tru
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00389.html (7,439 bytes)
- 3. RE: More on Sequential classes (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Lloyd" <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 12:00:11 -0400
- but don't these "fast" gals run in their respective open classes anyway? Jeff No, the flaw is that Shauna Marinus, Teresa Niedel, Lynn Rothney-Kozlak, Kay Bailey or any of the many, many fast ladies
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00390.html (7,962 bytes)
- 4. Re: More on Sequential classes (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 01:40:32 -0500
- Yes. We hear a lot about cars being compared at their most-developed level. Same for people. There is no reason that a highly-talented woman who takes the sport seriously cannot be competitive with m
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00417.html (8,668 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu