Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*More\s+on\s+engine\s+swaps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*More\s+on\s+engine\s+swaps\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. More on engine swaps (score: 1): Author: lesnyd@bb1t.monsanto.com (Larry E. Snyder lesnyd@monsanto.com 314-694-3626); Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 16:03:41 -0600; I've seen a lot of posts saying that Triumphs don't have that much collector value, so why not swap, etc. I maintain that a Triumph is not a triumph unless it has a Triumph engine. How a car looks is; /html/triumphs/1995-12/msg00115.html (7,294 bytes)
2. Re: More on engine swaps (score: 1): Author: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>; Date: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 10:36:15 -0800 (PST); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You mean like the TR8 (Rover, nee B-O-P)? Or the Triumph 1800/2000 Roadster and T&C/Renown Saloon (Standard engines)? Or the TR2-4 itself (modified Standard Vanguard)?; /html/triumphs/1995-12/msg00127.html (8,233 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]